Baver's Buckeye Bag - Picking Through Oklahoma Debris and Army

Listen to Baver Friday Mornings at 7:40 am on CD1025 and follow @baverbuckeyebag


Colin: Ok, it's the question that's been asked a million times, a million different ways, but here goes: Oklahoma puts 10 guys on the line with one safety and we cannot complete a down field pass. This should be like shooting fish in a barrel. What the hell?

Baver: It’s several things… JT’s inaccuracy, JT not trusting his WRs, the WRs inability to get open, and the offensive game plan. There are HUGE problems with JT and the WRs, no doubt about it. And OSU’s all-time leading passer in several categories may soon find a seat on the bench. But the offense we saw Saturday night is still Urban’s…”same as it ever was…same as it ever was”. And the video on Eleven Warrior’s Ramzy Nasrallah’s Twitter Feed linked here >https://twitter.com/ramzy/status/906929593671712768 shows OU free safety Will Johnson knowing the precise rout Parris Campbell would run before Campbell even ran it. This is mind-boggling. But back to your comment about Oklahoma selling out to stop the run. Ohio State still ran the ball well, getting 101 yards off 16 carries between Dobbins and Weber. Why did they only have 16 combined carries? This is an Urban thing, and the extended 5 ½ year honeymoon officially ended for Urban this past Saturday.

Colin: Teams have adjusted to stop J.T. Barrett. The offensive numbers against Michigan, Clemson and Oklahoma are brutal. Let alone the fact Watson and Mayfield completely out played our QB. That is not the recipe for success. Is there any hope of a J.T. revival?

Baver: I was one of JT’s biggest supporters, and finally started to jump ship after re-watching the Indiana game. After watching the Oklahoma game twice, I have little hope for him. As mentioned before, it’s certainly not all JT’s fault, but his confidence is shot, reminding me a lot of Todd Boeckman’s downward spiral in 2008. If Urban sticks with JT, I will still root my ass off for him and hope I’m wrong.

Colin: Meanwhile, the defense hasn't exactly been kicking ass and taking names either. What do you see on that side of the ball?

Baver: The D-line is still fine, actually better than fine. The back-7 was horrendous Saturday. Losing Raekwon McMillian has hurt way more than I thought it would. Worley looked lost all night against OU, and preseason All-American Jerome Baker looked lost as well. I never saw this coming….not thinking a Greg Schiano defense would get shredded at any point this season. Damon Arnette making huge strides in the offseason? Not. JUCO transfer Kendall Sheffield the next great OSU corner? Far from it, so far. And the safeties appeared to be out of position much of the evening as Baker Mayfield carved up the entire back-7.

Colin: Does anything that happens against Army this weekend matter at all?

Baver: Who knows, maybe JT gets some confidence back, or maybe we get a look at Burrow or Haskins, possibly even in the first half. I loved how Jim Tressel bent over backwards to salute Navy when they came here, but actually playing these service academies is not good for your team. Gotta hope the Bucks avoid injuries facing Army’s blocking schemes, specifically cut blocks. And you have to spend all kinds of time stopping an offense you won’t see again during the season. Urban said they spent time in August preparing for Army, noting that you can’t play that kind of option attack with only one week of preparation. I do think however, that OSU covers the 30-pt spread in similar fashion to how they covered late against Indiana. I look for 4 or 5 second half Buckeye TDs after the Black Knights run out of gas. The call: 48-14 Ohio State.

Colin: What other games and lines will you be keeping an eye on this weekend?

Baver: Give me Tom Herman in the underdog roll every time….as the Longhorns visit USC in the Coliseum. Should be a good game, and I’ll gladly take Texas and the 16 pts there. USC made me pay last week, but I’ll try again. And I will stick with Oklahoma St again this week, laying 13 ½ pts at Pittsburgh. Seems like a lot of points on the road, but I’m still not convinced anyone outside of Alabama can slow down the Ok State offense. And I like Clemson -3 at Louisville, even though they are in a letdown spot after their win over Gus’ Auburn Tigers. Clemson is still loaded and I think will be too much for Lamar Jackson and the Cardinals.

Return of the North Coast Posse. Browns v Steelers

@Northcoastposse are considered a Top 5 twitter follow by the real Cleveland Browns.

Q:  Before diving into the upcoming Browns season, everybody is talking about the big beef between you guys and Bomani Jones in the off season. What happened there?

Big$: Well, it appears I was just peripheral damage in the Bomani Jones scandal. The real beef began on a trip Mr. Jones made to Columbus. He encountered an "over saturated" Ben Galli at the 4 String taproom and they engaged in a heated two-and-a-half hour debate over who is better: Avery Bradley or Kentavious Caldwell Pope (we at Pencilstorm sports all support KCP). The argument ended with B. Galli reminding Bo that he was replaced on air in Big 10 country by an SEC talk show. Since then he has had an online axe to grind with p.storm.

Q:  So it looks like we are starting the Kizer era. What are your expectations on this offense?

K-Dubs, the Soldier:  I think Kizer was a steal as a third-round pick in this year’s draft.  He has a strong arm and moves well in the pocket.  At least in the preseason, he did not show the happy-footed tendency of many young quarterbacks to tuck the ball and run when the first or second option is not open.  He keeps his eyes down field, but he still has the mobility to make a play with his legs when needed.  The two most promising things about him so far are his ability to deliver the ball on the money and throw receivers open, and, according to all reports, he is putting in the study time outside of practice to master Coach Jackson’s offense.   

The Browns also made solid investments in the line, signing center JC Tretter and right guard Kevin Zeitler to help protect Kizer.  Like with any young QB, the Browns will likely focus on running the ball and the new additions to the front five should help with that, as well.   

Big$:  My expectations for the offense would be much higher if TP was here to act as a playmaking crutch for Deshone.  I think the aggressive defense will be exciting, however it's also going to make some mistakes which will leave the O playing catch up. Im not sure this group is ready for that.

Q:  Since we money-balled T Pryor out of town, does this team have the necessary wide outs to help the rookie quarterback?

Big$:  As I've already mentioned, I'm mourning the TP loss. I think Corey Coleman has some playmaking ability, but between Ricardo Louis and Sammie Coates there are some serious hands issues. Last time I checked, catching is kind of important as a receiver. I’m concerned about this current crop and am already penciling in that monster we just saw from Indiana University (Simmie Cobbs) in as a Browns draft pick in the near future.

K-Dubs, the Soldier:  This is the biggest question mark for the team as a whole.  The receiver unit has yet to show the ability to separate from coverage consistently.  Coach Jackson is going to have to scheme hard to open up the offense.  

Q: What should we expect from the 2017 Browns defense led by new psychotic DC Gregg Williams?

Big$: Well, expectations have to change with the news that Myles Garrett is out for about four weeks with a high ankle sprain. However, I believe that will give them a chance to highlight the secret weapon, aka Carl Nassib. I really expect him to shine, as well as his other Big 10 brethren, Joe Schobert, who is now starting at middle linebacker. As a group, I expect to see tenacity which will be fun to watch, but I also expect the aggressive exuberance to lead to mistakes and missed assignments. Growing pains, but exciting growing pains.

K-Dubs, the Soldier: Expect a lot of improvement on the defensive side of the ball.  Williams is known for his aggressive, attacking style of defense.  In the preseason, the most promising result I saw from Williams’ influence was that the defensive backs are making tackles at, and sometimes behind, the line of scrimmage.  Better support from the corners and safeties against the run should lessen the times the Browns get gashed outside the tackles, which has plagued them in the last few years.  With last week’s releases of fan-favorite Joe Haden (for financial reasons) and offseason acquisition Calvin Pryor (for fighting a teammate), though, they are thin at DB.  So hopefully Williams’ scheme won’t subject that unit to fatigue and injury.  Also, the Browns have built more quality depth on the defensive front.  Once Myles Garrett and Danny Shelton return from injury, I think the sack numbers will go up and the opponent’s third-down conversion rate will drop.

Is Jabrill Peppers already the best player on this defense?

K-Dubs, the Soldier:  Not even.  He is a nice addition, and he has ball-hawking skills a la Troy Palomalu or the Honey Badger, but his biggest impact this year should be on special teams.  The Browns have been hurting in the return game since Josh Cribbs left town.  The inability to flip field position on a big return, or even field a punt consistently, has certainly contributed to some of the many losses the Browns have suffered in the last few years.  Peppers has an explosiveness that should improve the average starting field position for this young offense.  That said, he should be a solid, regular presence in the defensive backfield, but he still ranks behind Shelton and Garrett, and linebackers Jamie Collins and Christian Kirksey.

Big$:  I don't think Peppers has unseated Collins as the best player on the D......yet. He has definitely shown the propensity for electric playmaking already and I can't wait to see him get after it.

Q:  Is Myles Garrett ready to live up to his #1 overall hype?

K-Dubs, the Soldier:  Yep … so long as he stays healthy.  Garrett is a physical freak born to smash QBs and he has shown he can play the run down the line of scrimmage.  No matter what happens with other top-5 draft picks from this year’s draft, the Browns could not pass on this dude.  He is already starting and was making plays in the preseason.

Q:  Who else on this team do you expect to have an impact?

Big$:  I literally believe that new center JC Tretter will be the most impactful player on the team. It's not a sexy pick but all you have to do is track Alex Mack's last few years for how important JC may be. I also think Cam Erving's absence will be quite impactful.

K-Dubs, the Soldier:  I think this roster simply has more impact players overall compared to the last few years, but I expect breakout seasons from Schobert, who is a playmaker at middle linebacker, and Emmanuel Ogbah at defensive end.  

Q:  If the Browns could upset the Steelers in week one, would that make the season a success?

K-Dubs, the Soldier:  In Trump-anese, “It would be yooouuuuuugggeee.”    That would really set the momentum in the right direction and could precipitate more early wins, but a single victory against Pittsburgh wouldn’t make the season a success in and of itself.  

Q:  Vegas has the Browns at 4.5 wins. Do you like the over or under?

K-Dubs, the Soldier:  The NCP has nailed this question the last few years.  With games against the Jets, Jags, Bears, Chargers, and a Week 3 game against the Colts, which will likely still be missing Andrew Luck, I am feeling the over in 2017.

Big$:  I'm a Browns fan, I always take the under.



 

 

Baver's Buckeye Bag / Buckeyes vs Sooners - by Brent Baver

Every week of the college football season, Pencilstorm Buckeye guru answers our questions and yours. Follow and shoot him questions @baverbuckeyebag

Colin: Last year, a young OSU team went on the road and blew the doors off the Sooners in what turned out to be the Bucks best downfield passing performance of the year. Since then, tape shows serious flaws in JT and the company's ability to vertically stretch the field. Have we solved this issue or could the Okies stack the box and cause us big trouble?

Baver: I’ve been sticking up for JT for a long time, but after re-watching the 1st half of the Indiana game, it’s pretty clear that JT’s accuracy issues are still glaring. Hell, you even had Indiana’s head coach (Tom Allen) referring to Barrett as “….a QB that’s not that accurate”. Ouch. I thought JT looked better in the 2nd half, but even most of the short completions in the 1st half weren’t really on the mark. To be fair, Barrett’s WR’s aren’t helping the vertical threat much at all. If I’m Mike Stoops and Oklahoma, I’m definitely stacking the box, and challenging Barrett and OSU’s so-called Zone 6 to beat me.

Colin: Along those lines, could the Bucks be over-confident after the easy W last year and be primed for a Va Tech style surprise / slaughter?

Baver: Overconfidence is something I haven’t heard brought up this week, but it’s a valid concern, especially with 20-year old kids that are only a year removed from that easy W.

Colin: Dobbins impressed at RB, but is it a good sign that a freshman could start on a potential National Championship contender? Is his ceiling higher than Weber’s? 

Baver: I was taking a wait and see approach with Dobbins, so I waited….and I saw. I think the question now is, “How can you not start him?” Yeah, JKD’s upside is ridiculous.

Colin: What did you like and dislike about the team's performance at Bloomington?

Baver: We talked about Barrett’s accuracy problems. Obviously the OSU cornerbacks could have played much better, but I think they will be fine in the long run. I think all aspects of Ohio St’s kicking game looked suspect. As far as likes, I still think you give credit where credit is due, with the things JTB does do well. The guy remained extremely poised despite OSU being down for much of the game. He was a very effective runner, like he always is. And he played better when the game was on the line, another thing JT almost always does. Other likes? The O-line looked improved and of course JK Dobbins is going to be special.

Colin: Do you think Mayfield and Co. will find similar success to the Hoosiers picking on our young cornerbacks? 

Baver: Mayfield is going to have success in different ways. He won’t have a 6’5”, 220-pound Simmie Cobb to abuse OSU corners, but Mayfield is way more mobile than Richard Lagow, and he likely won’t make the stupid mistakes Lagow eventually always makes. I think you’ll see Mayfield be much more successful Saturday night than he was a year ago, and TE Mark Andrews will be his main target.

Colin: How do you see the Buckeyes winning this game and what scenario should make us the nervous?

Baver: Gotta admit, I am backtracking from comments I made on CD102.5 the morning after the Indiana game. I tend to think Ohio State gets the W Saturday night, but I’m not so sure. If the OSU offense produces zero vertical threat whatsoever, then they are probably in trouble. Oklahoma has no doubt spent countless hours working on the things they didn’t do well a year ago against Ohio St. Mark Andrews is the best pass catching TE in the nation, and he worries me more than anything else, I’d say. Ultimately, I think OSU will again get things going late this week, will make enough big plays on defense, and will mix things up enough on O to get it done. I like Ohio State 35-31.

Colin: What other games and lines will you be keeping an eye on this week?

Baver: One week doesn’t make a season, but Oklahoma State’s offense is sick. They should have been on my sleeper list that you asked me about last week. I think they roll on the road at South Alabama Friday night. So OK Lite is the play there IMO, laying the 28 ½. And I like Stanford catching 6 on the road at USC – should be a tight game, and Stanford may simply be the better football team. My picks against the spread on the OSU games continue to be red hot, but I am struggling to play .500 on other games as of late.

 

The Ethics of WWE and a Good Show - by Big Vin Vader

The Ethics of WWE and a Good Show     Follow @bigvinvader

 WWE have come under fire from a number of longtime fans and supporters for failing to comment on the president’s recent comments regarding the violence in Charlottesville.  This isn’t a political column, and my opinions are not going on record at this time, especially since I don’t feel that I’m qualified to discuss such matters.  Despite that, the fact remains that Donald Trump has been involved in the WWE product in varying capacities over the years, and is a member of the Hall of Fame’s beyond-dubious celebrity wing.  In addition to this, the McMahons donated millions of dollars to Trump’s campaign, which all but ensured Linda McMahon’s appointment as Administrator of the Small Business Administration.  Also worth noting is that wrestlers in the company were reportedly forbidden from commenting on the 2016 election on social media.  Regardless of one’s feelings on any of these matters, it’s hard to argue that WWE (or at the least, the McMahons) is tied up into the whole issue through their long association.  That being said, it’s kind of pointless to expect accountability for WWE’s behavior as it pertains to ethical issues, and there are a number of examples in the recent past that exemplify this.

Brock Lesnar is one of the clearest example of the company’s problems with accountability for their and their performers’ actions.  It gets brought up every once in a while, but not often, that in 2004 Brock Lesnar told an ESPN reporter, “I don't like gays. Write that down in your little notebook. I don't like gays.”  So not only is he on record with a homophobic statement (and off the record with even more offensive language), but he went through the motions to specify his meaning, not caring that it was made public.  And he continues to be one of the company’s highest-paid, -drawing, and most protected wrestlers, not to mention the current Universal Champion.  I don’t know of anyone going out of their way to call Brock Lesnar a good person, and that isn’t his intention in the slightest.  He’s made it clear that he shows up, works, gets paid, and goes home.  That’s all they need him to do as long as he draws big, gets a good reaction, and occasionally have decent matches.  All of which he does.

Then again, that interview is over a decade old at this point, and Brock wasn’t even in the company at the time it occurred.  However, after his concussion-inducing beatdown on Randy Orton at last year’s SummerSlam, Brock was approached by an angry, concerned Chris Jericho.  In the skirmish that ensued, Brock is rumored to have called Jericho a number of homophobic and sexist names.  Not only was Lesnar on WWE’s dime at the time, but he was also backstage at one of their events.  And to this day, a full year later, there’s still been no release on the actual content of his comments, but that doesn’t seem to matter to anyone, and the event has basically been forgotten.  All of this has conveniently faded away, especially for a company that openly touts its affiliation with GLAAD (not to even get into the issue of their essentially scripting a legit concussion).

This is all meandering on my part, so it’s important to remember that WWE is openly affiliated with GLAAD (not that they haven’t had several fallings out in the past).  I obviously can’t speak for anyone else, but it makes you wonder how an openly-gay superstar like Darren Young must feel being part of the same company as a person on record as Lesnar is, all the while they tout their progressive affiliations and attitudes.  Seems hypocritical.  And imagine if Young were to try and call WWE to task for supporting Lesnar following his homophobic remarks.  Is there any doubt that Young would essentially be told to take a hike if he doesn’t like it, simply because Lesnar is so much bigger a draw, with greater crossover appeal?  Or what about Pat Patterson, who’s been with the company for decades, openly gay for much of that time, and who was even falsely demonized during the company’s early-90s sex scandals because of his sexual orientation?  You have to wonder what his thoughts are regarding Lesnar’s role in the company, and how he feels about that infamous interview.  The thing is, nobody has asked either of them, as Lesnar’s homophobic remarks are never discussed anymore.  They’re on the public record for everyone to see, and WWE seems fine to let things rest at that because they don’t need another PR nightmare.

An even more recent, infamous, and actively troubling example of the company’s failure to hold itself or its employees accountable for their questionable actions is the entire Mauro Ranall-JBL bullying controversy.  Mauro is easily the best announcer working full-time in professional wrestling today, and his presence on the SmackDown commentary team raised that brand’s play-by-play up from utter nonsense.  He also suffers from bipolar disorder and has been very open about this fact, doing all he can to spread awareness and help others like him.  Fans love Mauro, and his excellence as an announcer is highly-esteemed throughout the industry.  JBL is a terrible person with limited wrestling skills, esteemed highly within WWE simply because he is a company man and has stayed loyal for over two decades, which led to his lengthy world title run on SmackDown over a decade ago.*  He has a long history of harassment, bullying, and out-and-out drunken jackassery.  Because of his tenure, and a seeming closeness with Vince McMahon, all of his actions are excused and swept under the rug.  WWE has an alliance with anti-bullying campaign Be a Star, a fact they shove down every fan’s throat with endless commercial vignettes.  This should not be a bad thing.

Earlier this year, JBL openly mocked Mauro receiving the Wrestling Observer’s Announcer of the Year award on-air, a move that was absolutely endorsed and approved by Vince McMahon himself.  After missing several weeks for various reasons, it came out that Mauro had actually been suffering from severe depression.  The culpability of JBL’s taunts were heightened when former ring announcer Justin Roberts’ autobiography was released shortly after, as that book contained several stories of specific bullying perpetrated by the former champion.  The larger issue is that this is an ongoing thing, as other wrestlers (Edge, to name one), in biographies as well as interviews, have confirmed JBL’s influence backstage, as well as his brash, aggressive nature.

Ultimately, Mauro missed weeks of television and PPVs, before reporting his departure from the company.  In the weeks prior to this announcement, fans and journalists were calling for JBL’s head, and considering his behavior and the risk at which it put Mauro, it makes sense.  But after Ranallo’s departure, the whole thing kind of died down, stopping just before it became a full-blown scandal.  In a statement that reeked of a non-disclosure agreement, Ranallo stated that his leaving had nothing to do with JBL.  If that seems fishy, what then of his hasty return to the company a few months later, now working full-time on NXT, far away from JBL?  I do have to say that it’s fantastic to have him back on a major stage, and NXT is arguably a much better fit for his hyper-energetic commentary style.  But even with his return, there was little discussion of the events that made him leave in the first place, and that seems wrong.

I guess I’m just rambling, but the main point, I think, is that it’s kind of ridiculous to expect WWE to really back what they’re saying and work toward positive, progressive change in light of this kind of history.  And that’s really discouraging, and I know of several folks who have given up on the company entirely in recent months because of such behavior.  It makes it seem that the majority of the company’s charitable gestures and associations are solely for appearances, which makes sense in the most cynical of senses.  To look at it historically, wrestling was never clean, family entertainment until Vince McMahon raided the territories and built up his semi-cartoon empire in the mid 1980s.  At that point, wrestling became sports entertainment and was then answerable to network decency standards.  Remember, the “family-friendly” WWE (then still the WWF) was beset with a host of cocaine and steroid addiction issues.  Down the line the company faced a major steroid trial (although the testing policies resumed their formerly-lax course shortly after until the late 2000s), a sex scandal involving ring boys and enhancement talent accusing high-ranking officials, controversy over the raunchiness of Attitude Era storylines, Owen Hart’s horrific death during a PPV, and most notably the now-decade-old Chris Benoit tragedy.  That’s a lot of dirt to dig up on such a public company, so no wonder they want to keep their image squeaky-clean.  But why has nobody been prying into these more recent issues?

Things change in some respects, and remain entirely the same in most others.  Vince McMahon is still reportedly body-shaming talent (Kevin Owens), putting titles on the most impressively-muscled guys on the roster, and burying popular underdogs (that would be Sami Zayn, as well as Bayley).  As much as we may want the things and people we like and support to endorse the same beliefs as ourselves, it often ends in disappointment.  Even when major issues like these arise, no matter what the fan backlash may be, WWE is an entertainment corporation above all else, and they will only take a stance on what they feel looks the best for them.  To not comment on the violence in Charlottesville or the political situation it is wrapped up in, or even Lesnar’s homophobic attitudes and JBL’s line-crossing, is entirely within their rights.  As disappointing as that is, it’s just where things rest nowadays.

Big Vin Vader covers WWE for Pencilstorm

 

*Author’s opinion

SummerSlam Recap by - Big Vin Vader

SummerSlam Recap

Follow @bigvinvader

 

I went into SummerSlam expecting very little from the show.  After New Japan’s amazing G1 Climax tournament, as well as the catastrophe that was Battleground, I really only saw promise in the Fatal Four-Way main event.  On top of that, last year’s SummerSlam was an abysmal show saved only by John Cena and AJ Styles’ fantastic encounter.  Not to mention that this year’s WrestleMania was a major let-down, so there seemed no reason to expect Vince to pick up the ball after that kind of mess.

Sure, Kevin Owens vs. AJ Styles promised to be good, albeit underwhelming given the addition of Shane McMahon as ref.  And both RAW and SmackDown’s Women’s Title matches were sure to be winners given the talent of the wrestlers involved, but WWE has been giving the division sub-ten minute slots lately.  Only the main event looked to be a surefire thing, and it felt like there could be a legitimate changing of the guard with rumors of Brock Lesnar’s imminent return to UFC.  Those particular matches actually exceeded my expectations, and several of the other undercard bouts proved to be more than worthwhile outings.

The show kicked off with Baron Corbin vs. John Cena, ending their recent feud.  Cena cost Corbin his Money in the Bank cash-in on SmackDown, signaling the company’s total loss in faith in Corbin.  It wasn’t anything special as a match, although Baron did lay a pretty convincing beating into Cena.  Of course, none of that mattered as Cena scored a clean win, pushing Corbin one step closer to full-on burial.  While I’m not a huge fan of his, you almost have to feel bad for Baron at this point, having so many huge opportunities, deserved or not, taken away from him.  He really could have used the win here.

Up next was Natalya vs. Naomi for the latter’s SmackDown Women’s championship, and they more than delivered on the initial promise of their match.  As always, Naomi impressed with her innovative offense, and Natalya continues to be an underrated worker.  They went a good eleven minutes, much better than the usual six-minute window Women’s title matches have been given on most shows.  It was legitimately surprising to see Naomi submit to the Sharpshooter, crowning Natalya the new SmackDown Women’s champion.  Even if her reign is brief, it’s well deserved and it will be interesting to see where she takes the division.

I legitimately did not care about Big Cass vs. The Big Show, and didn’t pay much attention.  All I have to say is that it’s a bad sign when Enzo Amore’s real-life heat is more interesting than the build to a match.  Cass won, by the way

Rusev vs. Randy Orton followed, and it was the definition of a nowhere match for a nowhere feud.  Rusev jumped Orton before the bell, then got pinned after an RKO in five seconds.  That was it.  So two talented young stars were mercilessly buried by the old guard.  Not a great sign so far.

Sasha Banks vs. Alexa Bliss was next, and at this point it seemed a lock for the women’s divisions of each brand to steal the show.  This was a good, brutal, fast-paced match that benefitted from the rumors of real-life heat between the two, as well as its being given nearly fifteen minutes.  Both wrestlers’ strengths were on full display, even with little reaction from the crowd, and they delivered a solid brawl with some serious wrestling mixed in.  Sasha picked up a surprise win, and was given another long-overdue title run.  That didn’t last however, as Alexa regained the belt on the August 28th RAW, which is fine by me as she has continually impressed over the last year.

Finn Balor vs. Bray Wyatt was kind of an oddity on the card, the definition of a midcard, B-level PPV match featuring two stars who deserve better.  It’s sad to think that Finn was in the first-ever Universal Title match with Seth Rollins at this same show last year.  Even sadder that he won, was stripped due to injury, and has yet to recover on RAW.  Bray spent the early months of this year as WWE champion and has since gone downhill himself.  Balor’s Demon King character reappeared for the first time since last year’s SummerSlam, and the crowd was going crazy for him.  There was some good monster-versus-monster psychology on display, and the match actually came together much better than I had expected.  Balor picked up a much-needed win, and hopefully he’ll start being taken seriously once again.

The reunion of Shield members Dean Ambrose and Seth Rollins has been a big storyline lately, and it was no surprise just how good they worked together against Sheamus and Cesaro.  This was one of the better Tag Team Title matches I’ve seen in a while, and it was full of exciting spots and excellent chemistry all-around.  In easily the best match thus far, Ambrose and Rollins managed to win the belts from the odd couple.  Everyone looked great, and it was nice to see the former Shield mates get some due recognition after floundering for most of the year.

Kevin Owens vs. AJ Styles should have been the unquestionable match of the night, and even while it was slightly disappointing, it came close.  There’s been a good build to the story, although their previous two matches were somewhat underwhelming.  The problem this time was the announcement of Shane McMahon as guest referee.  There were the expected unnecessary ref bumps in the middle of the match, but Owens and Styles delivered the best of their three matches so far, with parts coming together perfectly.  There’s bound to be a McMahon-Owens feud coming up, especially since Kevin is forbidden from challenging AJ again.

I think every wrestling fan was dreading Shinsuke Nakamura vs. Jinder Mahal for the WWE Championship.  I know I was.  It never should have been booked in the first place, as it’s debatable whether Shinsuke is currently equipped to carry the entire SmackDown brand, and that meant he would have to lose to someone far inferior to him in the ring.  Which is what happened.  Don’t get me wrong, as with all of his recent matches, Jinder was far from terrible, but also just as far from exceptional.  They used the same distraction finish with the Singh Bros.’ interference costing Shinsuke the match.  That was awful.

The Fatal Four-Way between Samoa Joe, Braun Strowman, Roman Reigns and Brock Lesnar for the Universal Championship was the bright light on the card.  Joe and Lesnar have proven to be a good match for one another, Reigns and Strowman have done the same, and a Lesnar-Strowman match-up has been teased for some time as the next big thing.  On top of that, Lesnar’s promise to leave the company should he lose and the real news of his interest in a UFC return made this legitimately unpredictable.  Keeping with the company’s good track record of multi-man matches this year, this one delivered non-stop, chaotic and crowd-pleasing action.  Braun vs. Brock surpassed all expectations, with Strowman dominating Lesnar on the outside, destroying two tables and flipping a third onto the stunned champion.  Braun looked absolutely vicious and credible here, nothing like the green monster heel of this time last year.  He really is ready for bigger things, and demonstrated that in true fashion with this career-best performance.  Nobody looked bad, but Strowman just delivered such a powerhouse showing that it’s hard to focus on much else.  They carried Brock out on a stretcher for the middle portion of the match, which all but ensured his victory, although it made him look vulnerable for the first time in far too long.  It was one of the main roster’s best all-round matches this year, and the space I have here truly can’t do justice to the carnage they captured in its twenty-minutes length.  A great end to a rocky show, albeit one eclipsed in every way by NXT, yet again.

 

This next part is a lot trickier to address, so I’ll just approach the facts of the matter: WWE have come under fire from a number of longtime fans and supporters for failing to comment on the president’s recent comments regarding the violence in Charlottesville.  This isn’t a political column, and my opinions are not going on record at this time, especially since I don’t feel that I’m qualified to discuss such matters.  Despite that, the fact remains that Donald Trump has been involved in the WWE product in varying capacities over the years, and is a member of the Hall of Fame’s beyond-dubious celebrity wing.  In addition to this, the McMahons donated millions of dollars to Trump’s campaign, which all but ensured Linda McMahon’s appointment as Administrator of the Small Business Administration.  Also worth noting is that wrestlers in the company were reportedly forbidden from commenting on the 2016 election on social media.  Regardless of one’s feelings on any of these matters, it’s hard to argue that WWE (or at the least, the McMahons) is tied up into the whole issue through their long association.  That being said, it’s kind of pointless to expect accountability for WWE’s behavior as it pertains to ethical issues, and there are a number of examples in the recent past that exemplify this.

Brock Lesnar is one of the clearest example of the company’s problems with accountability for their and their performers’ actions.  It gets brought up every once in a while, but not often, that in 2004 Brock Lesnar told an ESPN reporter, “I don't like gays. Write that down in your little notebook. I don't like gays.”  So not only is he on record with a homophobic statement (and off the record with even more offensive language), but he went through the motions to specify his meaning, not caring that it was made public.  And he continues to be one of the company’s highest-paid, -drawing, and most protected wrestlers, not to mention the current Universal Champion.  I don’t know of anyone going out of their way to call Brock Lesnar a good person, and that isn’t his intention in the slightest.  He’s made it clear that he shows up, works, gets paid, and goes home.  That’s all they need him to do as long as he draws big, gets a good reaction, and occasionally have decent matches.  All of which he does.

Then again, that interview is over a decade old at this point, and Brock wasn’t even in the company at the time it occurred.  However, after his concussion-inducing beatdown on Randy Orton at last year’s SummerSlam, Brock was approached by an angry, concerned Chris Jericho.  In the skirmish that ensued, Brock is rumored to have called Jericho a number of homophobic and sexist names.  Not only was Lesnar on WWE’s dime at the time, but he was also backstage at one of their events.  And to this day, a full year later, there’s still been no release on the actual content of his comments, but that doesn’t seem to matter to anyone, and the event has basically been forgotten.  All of this has conveniently faded away, especially for a company that openly touts its affiliation with GLAAD (not to even get into the issue of their essentially scripting a legit concussion).

This is all meandering on my part, so it’s important to remember that WWE is openly affiliated with GLAAD (not that they haven’t had several fallings out in the past).  I obviously can’t speak for anyone else, but it makes you wonder how an openly-gay superstar like Darren Young must feel being part of the same company as a person on record as Lesnar is, all the while they tout their progressive affiliations and attitudes.  Seems hypocritical.  And imagine if Young were to try and call WWE to task for supporting Lesnar following his homophobic remarks.  Is there any doubt that Young would essentially be told to take a hike if he doesn’t like it, simply because Lesnar is so much bigger a draw, with greater crossover appeal?  Or what about Pat Patterson, who’s been with the company for decades, openly gay for much of that time, and who was even falsely demonized during the company’s early-90s sex scandals because of his sexual orientation?  You have to wonder what his thoughts are regarding Lesnar’s role in the company, and how he feels about that infamous interview.  The thing is, nobody has asked either of them, as Lesnar’s homophobic remarks are never discussed anymore.  They’re on the public record for everyone to see, and WWE seems fine to let things rest at that because they don’t need another PR nightmare.

An even more recent, infamous, and actively troubling example of the company’s failure to hold itself or its employees accountable for their questionable actions is the entire Mauro Ranall-JBL bullying controversy.  Mauro is easily the best announcer working full-time in professional wrestling today, and his presence on the SmackDown commentary team raised that brand’s play-by-play up from utter nonsense.  He also suffers from bipolar disorder and has been very open about this fact, doing all he can to spread awareness and help others like him.  Fans love Mauro, and his excellence as an announcer is highly-esteemed throughout the industry.  JBL is a terrible person with limited wrestling skills, esteemed highly within WWE simply because he is a company man and has stayed loyal for over two decades, which led to his lengthy world title run on SmackDown over a decade ago.*  He has a long history of harassment, bullying, and out-and-out drunken jackassery.  Because of his tenure, and a seeming closeness with Vince McMahon, all of his actions are excused and swept under the rug.  WWE has an alliance with anti-bullying campaign Be a Star, a fact they shove down every fan’s throat with endless commercial vignettes.  This should not be a bad thing.

Earlier this year, JBL openly mocked Mauro receiving the Wrestling Observer’s Announcer of the Year award on-air, a move that was absolutely endorsed and approved by Vince McMahon himself.  After missing several weeks for various reasons, it came out that Mauro had actually been suffering from severe depression.  The culpability of JBL’s taunts were heightened when former ring announcer Justin Roberts’ autobiography was released shortly after, as that book contained several stories of specific bullying perpetrated by the former champion.  The larger issue is that this is an ongoing thing, as other wrestlers (Edge, to name one), in biographies as well as interviews, have confirmed JBL’s influence backstage, as well as his brash, aggressive nature.

Ultimately, Mauro missed weeks of television and PPVs, before reporting his departure from the company.  In the weeks prior to this announcement, fans and journalists were calling for JBL’s head, and considering his behavior and the risk at which it put Mauro, it makes sense.  But after Ranallo’s departure, the whole thing kind of died down, stopping just before it became a full-blown scandal.  In a statement that reeked of a non-disclosure agreement, Ranallo stated that his leaving had nothing to do with JBL.  If that seems fishy, what then of his hasty return to the company a few months later, now working full-time on NXT, far away from JBL?  I do have to say that it’s fantastic to have him back on a major stage, and NXT is arguably a much better fit for his hyper-energetic commentary style.  But even with his return, there was little discussion of the events that made him leave in the first place, and that seems wrong.

I guess I’m just rambling, but the main point, I think, is that it’s kind of ridiculous to expect WWE to really back what they’re saying and work toward positive, progressive change in light of this kind of history.  And that’s really discouraging, and I know of several folks who have given up on the company entirely in recent months because of such behavior.  It makes it seem that the majority of the company’s charitable gestures and associations are solely for appearances, which makes sense in the most cynical of senses.  To look at it historically, wrestling was never clean, family entertainment until Vince McMahon raided the territories and built up his semi-cartoon empire in the mid 1980s.  At that point, wrestling became sports entertainment and was then answerable to network decency standards.  Remember, the “family-friendly” WWE (then still the WWF) was beset with a host of cocaine and steroid addiction issues.  Down the line the company faced a major steroid trial (although the testing policies resumed their formerly-lax course shortly after until the late 2000s), a sex scandal involving ring boys and enhancement talent accusing high-ranking officials, controversy over the raunchiness of Attitude Era storylines, Owen Hart’s horrific death during a PPV, and most notably the now-decade-old Chris Benoit tragedy.  That’s a lot of dirt to dig up on such a public company, so no wonder they want to keep their image squeaky-clean.  But why has nobody been prying into these more recent issues?

Things change in some respects, and remain entirely the same in most others.  Vince McMahon is still reportedly body-shaming talent (Kevin Owens), putting titles on the most impressively-muscled guys on the roster, and burying popular underdogs (that would be Sami Zayn, as well as Bayley).  As much as we may want the things and people we like and support to endorse the same beliefs as ourselves, it often ends in disappointment.  Even when major issues like these arise, no matter what the fan backlash may be, WWE is an entertainment corporation above all else, and they will only take a stance on what they feel looks the best for them.  To not comment on the violence in Charlottesville or the political situation it is wrapped up in, or even Lesnar’s homophobic attitudes and JBL’s line-crossing, is entirely within their rights.  As disappointing as that is, it’s just where things rest nowadays.

 

*Author’s opinion

Baver's Buckeye Bag / Ohio State vs Indiana - by Brent Baver

Every week of the college football season, Pencilstorm Buckeye guru answers our questions and yours. Follow and shoot him questions @baverbuckeyebag

Colin: Why did we schedule a conference weeknight road opener and what is the upside?

Brent: I think Gene Smith likes to show that OSU is willing to be a “team player”, where it will do some of the things that lesser B1G programs do, like playing a Thursday night game. In that sense, I think it’s pathetic. Ohio State is the elite of the elite, and should never be playing on a Thursday night. But my guess is that Urban was up for this, in that it gives them 2 extra days to prepare for a top-10 Oklahoma team.

Colin: Lots being made about the OSU D-Line playing more aggressive this year. What's the ceiling for this unit compared to past great Buckeye lines? 

Brent: It’s definitely the deepest unit I have seen here in the 40+ years I have been following Ohio State. Opposing coordinators have to be shaking their heads when they see Nick Bosa and Jalyn Holmes come in as “backups”. And it sounds like DT Dre’Mont Jones has made as much progress as any player on the team, other than maybe Damon Arnette. Not sure the 4 starters are as good as the ’02 foursome of Will Smith, Darion Scott, Kenny Peterson and Tim Anderson, but when you take depth into account, I think it will end up being the best D-line OSU has ever had.

Colin: Could Weber see his job threatened but upstart JK Dobbins? Any other youngsters you expect to have an impact right out of the gate?

Brent: A month ago I would have told you no way, but with Weber’s hamstring and Dobbins huge camp, I now think Dobbins will steal a decent amount of Weber’s carries. It also sounds like Dobbins is ahead of the curve in terms of blocking, a skill Urban demands of his backs and receivers. If healthy, I think Weber will likely remain your #1 guy all year, but he had a recent setback with the hammy. As for other youngsters, Kendall Sheffield is going to get a lot of PT as the 3rd CB. True frosh Jeffrey Okudah and Shawn Wade will push the top 3 corners as the season goes on.

Colin: Guest question from Rob Bumgarner: Can Isiah Prince hold up on the O Line?

Brent: I guess I believe the “he’s turned the corner” talk to an extent, but I still have to see it to really believe it. There has never been a question regarding Prince’s talent, which is part of the reason why he kept his job the entire 2016 season despite his poor protection numbers. The Bucks really, really need Prince to step up if they want to challenge for a Nat’l Title.

Colin: How do you see this game going down?

Brent: My how things have changed with the Hoosiers, as they are not far from having top 5 defense in the league, while their offense may struggle. With a suspect O-line and probably the weakest set of backs in the league, Indiana is going to struggle scoring on an OSU defense that is the class of the B1G. If Indiana is going to have success on O, it will be through the air, as they have a solid QB in Lagow, and a nice set of WRs as long as you add Simmie Cobbs to the group. Cobbs may be held out Thursday night based on a July arrest. I think this one stays tight for awhile, with Ohio State’s depth wearing the Hoosiers down and the Buckeyes covering late. I’ll say Ohio State 35-10.

Colin: It seems like all the smart money is on Bama, Bucks, USC and FSU being the final four. Who of that group is most vulnerable and who do see you see as a sleeper nationally?

Brent: I think USC is the most vulnerable with the expectations now so much higher, and I still question whether Todd Helton is the guy for USC. Not sure you can call Washington a sleeper after making the Playoff a year ago, but few are talking about them this year, as it’s all USC this and USC that. I expect Washington to win the Pac 10 again. A deeper sleeper? Hard for me to choose one as all these teams seem to have material weaknesses, but maybe one out of the group of Miami, Texas, or dare I say it….Michigan.

Colin: Some big match-ups for opening weekend. What other games and lines will you be keeping an eye on?

Brent: It wouldn’t shock me to see the Noles upset Bama, although going against Bama in these early games is usually not smart. I do like FSU catching 7 pts in this one, but think Bama gets the W. By the way, Alabama is 0-3 (outright) in their last 3 games when they haven’t had Lane Kiffin as their OC. The Michigan – Florida game should be an old fashion defensive struggle. I tend to think Michigan pulls this one out, but if you can catch more than a FG, like it is now with the Gators a 3 ½ pt dog, I think you take the points. There is really nothing else that jumps out at me from a betting standpoint in Wk 1.