Do the Browns Resemble a Benny Hill Skit? The NCP go to London to Investigate.

London Calling for the North Coast Posse

Colin: I think it's awesome you guys shipped the NCP Browns Party Gremlin across the Atlantic Ocean so you could tailgate properly.  Seeing other sights while you are in London?

Big$: Full disclosure, K-dubs and I are in negotiations to get a half hour (or halfe houre as they say across the pond) show on the BBC titled "Pencil Storm Gremlin Talk." Some suits at the network are concerned that some of our anti-Beatle rants from the past may surface and derail it, so we're here smoothing things over. It's a coincidence that the Browns are also playing.

Colin: Not to put a damper on your roadtrip across the pond but.... Carson Wentz, Jared Goff and Deshaun Watson are all tearing up the NFL while Kenny Britt is taking Deshone Kizer out to tear up the bars. Meanwhile the Browns were already the worst team in the league before losing their All Pro tackle / ironman Joe Thomas. I think I ask this question every year, but is right now, the lowest point in Browns history? 

K-Dubs, the Soldier: Yes.  This is the lowest point I can remember.  It is disappointing to now think of 3-13 seasons as halcyon days.  

Big$:  I think expectations play heavily into the depth of certain situations. I had next to no hope for this team going into the season, so it's hard to feel real low about where they are at. Plus, I think there are some pieces in defense that may be bright spots. For me, watching grown men parade around in Manziel jerseys, convincing themselves that he had an inkling of NFL talent will always be the low point.

Colin: The NFL is trying to create excitement in England, are the Browns the right team to be showcasing American football to a bunch of futball hooligans?

Big$:   The Browns offense quite often resembles a Benny Hill skit, so this may be just what the Dr. ordered for NFL/England relations.

Colin: Do you see anything positive on the field?

K-Dubs, the Soldier:   I am still liking the defense.  A lot of media attention has focused on how rookie safety Jabrill Peppers plays excessively deep, but these commentators are missing out on how well the rest of the defensive back field is playing.  Jason McCourty is rated as one of the top cornerbacks in the league, and Briean Boddy-Calhoun and Derrick Kindred are becoming fan favorites.  Linebackers Kirksey and Schobert are having good seasons, too.  We just need Miles Garrett to stay on the field so we can ratchet up pressure on the quarterback.  On the offensive side, positivity is harder to find.  Part of the problem is that Hue Jackson has to give up play-calling duties.  He continues to baffle with deep throws on 3rd-and-short situations and failing to get the electrifying Duke Johnson any more than 7 touches per game.  He and his staff have also failed to curtail the penalties that have killed offensive momentum on countless possessions (notice I didn’t say drives).  I still have faith in the development of Kizer but Hue has got to stick with him for better or worse, in good times and bad, until Jimmy do them part.

Big$:  I referenced some defensive pieces earlier and I'll cite Carl Nassib specifically. His emergence is especially interesting as I have grave concerns about Garrett's commitment and durability. Not to incite the PC police, but self-reporting concussion symptoms on Tuesday doesn't scream "football guy to build on" to me.

Colin: October is usually the time Browns fans start thinking about the upcoming NFL Draft. Any hope on the horizon?

Big$:   It's obvious that the lingering QB issue is still a question. At this point, I think Darnold goes back to USC and Josh Allen (Wyoming) seems to be a fraud. Rosen (UCLA) looks like the real deal, but I'm not sure the brash outspoken Cali kid model would fit in the 216. Therefore, I'm for drafting Barkley and trading for or signing an under the radar QB already in the league.

Colin: Will Hue survive the Browns and if not who would possibly want this job?

Big$:   I think Jimmy will stick it out with the Baseball bunch and Hue for another year because of A.) Rich dude Pride and B.) Ain't no one taking this job. I myself, would’ve fired everybody already. The culture is so toxic at 1-23 that I'm not sure that any leadership position can be salvaged.

K-Dubs, the Soldier:   I agree Hue keeps his job, but only because Jimmy has blown his coaching staff up so many times in the past and the changes have yet to bear fruit.  In the immortal words of Great White, “Once bitten, twice shy.”  (editor's note: Hey, that's the immortal words of Ian Hunter, Dubs.)  There has got to be a change in the front office, though.  

Colin: Who would Lebron start for this week?

Big$:  I'm starting Lebron at head coach, Hue needs a break.

K-Dubs, the Soldier:   GM Sashi Brown.  LeBron brought Derrick Rose and D-Wade to town.  Sashi did not even rate Wentz in his top 15 quarterbacks of last year’s draft, essentially spent $12 million for a second-round pick in the trade for Brock Osweiler, who he then cut and received nothing in return, passed on Deshaun Watson in this year’s draft, signed Kenny Britt, and has forgotten that you need at least a few quality veterans on your team to win.   

The North Coast Posse cover the Browns for Pencilstorm. They are a Top 5 Follow on Twitter. follow @northcoastposse

What can win or lose this game for OSU - Baver Answers Colin's Questions Part 2

Colin: I used to make fun of Trace McSorley for just chucking up jump balls and getting lucky. But he sure seems to get lucky a lot. Will this work against the OSU secondary?

Baver: I think most Buckeye fans have now seen enough of McSorley’s lobs into coverage to realize that it isn’t just luck when he completes so many of them. It helps having a 6’4” target in Juwan Johnson and a physical freak like 6’6” TE Mike Gesicki to throws lobs to. And their top WR DaeSean Hamilton isn’t small either (6’1”), and he plays the ball extremely well. It also appears that the Penn St offensive coaches do a pretty good job of finding their opponents’ matchup problems in coverage. This is a huge concern for Ohio St, as the Buckeye corners have had their problems in coverage, often not getting turned around to play the ball. 

Colin: Will Urban be wise and avoid kicking to Barkley on kickoffs or be stubborn and risk giving up a big play?

Baver: Barkley is a pretty good return man, 5th nationally (at this point) in KOR avg, but I am not sure he is at the level where you kick away from him. (Knock on wood.) Maybe you take more chances with the coffin corner, and concede to giving Penn St the ball at the 35 if the kick goes out of bounds. By the way, Parris Campbell would be 2nd in the nation in KO return avg, but he is one return shy of the minimum # of returns needed to qualify. If I were James Franklin, I wouldn’t be kicking the ball to Parris.

Colin: Penn State's defense has impressive numbers. Any true NFL caliber studs on that side of the ball?

Baver: Actually, not really. All 11 starters are draft eligible, but safety Marcus Allen and DE Shareef Miller are the only guys projecting as high as 2nd day picks. But Yahoo sports recently talked with 8 coaches that have played Penn St, and every one of them commented about how well the Nittany Lion defense plays together. And they have a lot of bodies that contribute on defense, with 17 different Penn St defenders having registered sacks so far this season. That’s crazy.

Colin: Final thoughts on what can win or lose the game for Ohio State?

Baver: We talked about the problems Buckeye defenders have getting turned around in coverage – this could be a huge factor. The Buckeye LBs are also going to have to play assignment football in playing the read option with McSorley/Barkley, and will have to hold their own in pass coverage. Protecting JT is also a must. On the other hand, if JT gets decent protection and throws the ball with confidence, I think Penn St is in trouble. And if JT makes Penn St respect his arm, JK Dobbins will get his yards against the Nits #1 rated rush D. We also talked yesterday about OSU biggest advantage Saturday, and that is their D-line vs PSU’s O-line.

Colin: Breakdown Ohio State-Penn St from a Vegas perspective. We’ll pass on the other games this week, as there is really only one game that matters.

Baver:  Most people I talk to think the 6 ½ pt spread is too high. That line likely has a lot to do with the situational angle, with Ohio St at home, off a bye and the Nits off the huge white-out home win against Michigan. Urban is 40-10 against the spread in gms where he has had more than 7 days to prepare for his opponent. If you know anything about picking games against the spread, that is insane. On the flip side, PSU has covered the Vegas spread in 15 of their last 17 games, another crazy stat. I wouldn’t lay 6 ½ in this one – Penn St’s offense is going to put points on the board. The McSorley/Barkley combo is as good as it gets. I think the game could go either way, but I think more things favor Ohio State in this one – there is a reason why they are just short of a touchdown favorite here. The Call: Ohio State 31 Penn State 28.

 

Why does OSU-Penn State seem bigger than other recent big games? Baver Answers Colin's Questions - Part 1

Colin: Why does this big game feel bigger than other recent big games? Future implications? Revenge? Is it because Ohio State fans truly dislike Penn State? 

Baver: The last two big game embarrassments at the hands of Clemson and Oklahoma have created a fragile OSU fan base. I’ve never seen Ohio St be a 6+ point favorite in a game and hear so many doubts from Buckeye fans. With Ohio State being: the team that has more talent, the team that has more depth, the team that has the better coaching staff, the team playing for revenge, the team that is at home, and the team that is off a bye…if that Buckeye team can’t beat a Penn St team that is far better at home than on the road, then this is a major dose of reality for Urban and Ohio St. So yes, future implications are huge here. Usually with those advantages, you simply check the win box if you are Ohio St. But you obviously can’t do that here. If there was any hope of doing so, those hopes were squashed when Penn State torched Don Brown’s vaunted Michigan defense last Saturday night. And that raised the stakes for Ohio State-Penn State even higher.

Colin: Who are you most concerned will hurt the Buckeyes: Saquon Barkley or Trace McSorley? Somebody else?

Baver: Probably McSorley, as his style is going to cause Ohio State problems. He is somewhat of Baker Mayfield clone, with the scrambling and improvising. The OSU defense couldn’t handle Mayfield in early September, but have they progressed enough to rein in McSorley? We shall see. With Barkley, I don’t see him grinding away at the Buckeye defense; it’s the plays where he breaks free for huge gains that I worry about more, but that of course is no small concern either. And the combo of the two, when McSorley runs the read option, is pretty hard to defend. McSorley will make you pay if you key too much on Saquon.

Colin: Can the Penn State O-line hold up against Nick Bosa and company?

Baver: I don’t think so. It’s an improved PSU O-line, but Ohio St’s D-line vs Penn St’s O-line is the biggest tangible advantage Ohio State has in this game. 

Colin: Will Penn State use the same defensive formation employed by MSU, MICH, Clemson and Oklahoma and dare JT Barrett to throw downfield? (10 up / 1 safety)

Baver: I think they will indeed stack the box to make JT beat them with his arm, and adjust if JT starts making them start paying for it. I mean, that is certainly what I’d do. JT is now throwing the ball better? JT now has much more confidence? If I’m Penn State, I say, “Prove it”.

Colin: What can Ohio State do to finally score against a top caliber team?

Baver: From a strategy standpoint, Urban has to keep running his tailbacks, a strategy he has gotten away from as the games wore on in some high profile losses. Curtis Samuel had only two carries in last year’s loss in Happy Valley. That was criminal…especially when one of those two carries went 74 yards to the house. Unless Penn St goes to ridiculous measures to take the run away, Urban and Kevin Wilson have to keep giving the ball to JK Dobbins. From a performance standpoint, JT has to throw the ball with confidence, and trust his WR’s….a group that has come a long way since being shut down by the Sooners.

Colin: The forecast on Saturday is for rain. Who does this benefit?

Baver: OSU’s performances against Sparty the past two seasons tell me that bad weather is not a good thing for Ohio State. But from an X’s and O’s standpoint, I think the bad weather probably favors Ohio St. If both teams are reduced to mostly running the football because of the weather, I like Ohio St’s chances of stopping Penn St’s running game more than I like Penn St’s chances of stopping OSU’s running game. It doesn’t matter to me that PSU has the top-ranked run defense nationally; it’s going to be harder for the Penn St O-line to make that Buckeye D-line budge. Also of note, JK Dobbins actually has more rushing yards than Saquon Barkley this season on quite a few less carries. Urban just can’t abandon the tailback run in a big game again, or I’m going to have a mental breakdown.

 

 

 

  

 

What if MLB Didn't Have Playoffs? - by Jack Obora

While I celebrated the fall of the Yankees in Game 7 of the ALCS this past Saturday night, I couldn’t help but feel a little disappointed at how the season ended. As an Indians fan, I’d once again be watching the World Series without a real rooting interest. I suppose having both my favorite teams in the Series last year means I don’t get to enjoy such spoils for at least a couple more decades, and as a Cleveland fan in general I’ve had plenty of practice watching other teams win championships, but it doesn’t make it any more fun. In terms of wins and losses, this was the second-best Indians team ever, and they played like it. But instead they get to watch from the couch because of a team that didn’t even win their division.

But why even have divisions? Prior to Major League Baseball splitting things up into East and West in 1969 and long before our modern-day addiction to playoffs (and their TV revenue) the World Series was played between the two teams who compiled the best record all season. Finished 3 games behind the Yankees? Tough luck. Had a hot September but a cold July? There’s always next year. A 162-game season was considered a better indicator of who was the best team in the land than two abbreviated series of 3-7 games spaced out over a month. Weird, huh?

Still, I wondered: How different would the World Series have been if there weren't playoffs? What if, instead of the two hottest teams in October, we saw a battle between the two best teams in baseball? I decided to spend my entire evening take a little time to figure it out, and here’s what I found:

 

  • The first team to have the best record in their League and fail to win the Pennant was the 1972 Pirates, who lost to the Reds in the deciding 5th game on a wild pitch, in what turned out to be the last game of Roberto Clemente’s career. Oakland (who did have the best record in the AL) would top the Reds in 7 to take the World Series.

  • The first World Series to feature two teams without the best record in their League was 1973. A “traditional” World Series would have featured the Orioles and Reds, instead of the A’s and the Mets.

  • During the East-West divisional years, the “traditional” World Series remained fairly common, with 13 instances of the top-seeded playoff teams facing each other in the Fall Classic and only 5 instances where neither top seed made it. In the Wild Card Era, though, it’s another story; there have only been 3 “traditional” Series since 1995, compared to 9 without either top seed. Considering we’ve now had the Wild Card nearly as long as we had the East-West format (there’s a scary thought) it’s a pretty stark contrast.

  • If you got sick of Bobby Cox getting outcoached in the World Series in the 90s, then you’re probably thankful for the Wild Card. Without it, the Braves would have won 9 NL pennants between 1992-2003, including 7 in a row bookended by the Barry Bonds-led Pirates and Giants. The Yankees would have been in the Series less in the 90s, but more in the 00s, so there unfortunately wouldn’t be much difference there.

  • Much to the chagrin of ESPN, the Yankees-Mets Subway Series would not have happened in 2000, which would have instead featured the White Sox and Giants. They would still have gotten their wish in 2006.

  • The Chicago Cubs’ 2016 NL Pennant would not have been the one to snap their World Series drought. Instead, it would’ve been their fourth Pennant since 1984, and their second in the last ten years. Still, considering the teams they would have been facing in the 80s (the powerhouse ’84 Tigers and ’89 A’s), it still may very well have been the team that broke the Championship drought.

  • The Marlins, Padres and Rockies would still be without a World Series appearance. But the Mariners’ 116-game winners would have made it in 2001, and the Nationals would have two Pennants since 2012.

  • Indians fans can breathe a sigh of relief that neither of their extra-inning-game-7 tragedies would have occurred, as they wouldn’t have made the Series to suffer through it. They would, however, have gotten a rematch with the Braves in 1996, and we’d be watching Corey Kluber and Andrew Miller quiet down Dodger Stadium instead of watching the Astros’ pitching melt in the LA heat.

You can draw your own conclusions about how Nolan Ryan would have fared against Reggie Jackson in ’80, or whether Don Denkinger’s blown call at 1st would have given the Blue Jays their first ever World Series title in ’85. But I’d settle for adding some meaning to the regular season and rewarding success all year long, not just at the last minute.

 

Jack Obora is a political liberal and a sports conservative. He lives in Dublin with his girlfriend, his cat, and his music library, and spends way too much time learning things that will help him win bar trivia nights. You can follow him on Twitter @JackObora.

Hell in a Cell: It's What's Outside That's Worse - by Big Vin Vader

Hell in a Cell - It’s What’s Outside That’s Worse follow @bigvinvader

 

Hell in a Cell is a unique show.  The titular stipulation is easily one of the best in wrestling, but only when the build and participants are just right, and the match is a unique spectacle.  Trouble is, with Hell in a Cell existing as a PPV card, as well as an outlying stipulation, it’s oversaturated and rarely delivers as it did in the past.  Also an issue is how many matches on the show use the cell, diluting the sense of urgency and danger it once represented.  Last year there were three HIAC matches, this year there were two, and both topped 2016’s offerings, while the overall card was far stronger as well.

The key to the success of the Cell matches was the quality of the feuds involved.  The New Day and the Usos have been feuding for SmackDown’s tag titles for months, almost always stealing the show when they meet.  After so many back-and-forth contests, the finality of Hell in a Cell seemed the perfect way to settle matters.  On top of that, this was the first tag team title match ever held in the structure, meaning it would be fresh and exciting.  On the other end of the card was Kevin Owens vs. Shane McMahon, in a feud that’s been building since before SummerSlam.  This one promised to be a stunt show, but the story behind it was too good to simply write it off.  Family man Kevin Owens took on the entire McMahon clan in the build-up, insulting Shane in front of his family and questioning his motives for interfering in his last match with AJ Styles.  Then, in one of the year’s best segments, Owens took on Vince himself, bloodying the CEO and cementing his clash with Shane.  Then there was the fact that the match could end in a number of ways which could all make sense for long-term.  And it’s never a bad thing to see Kevin Owens in a main-event spot.  There was little chance that this match would not deliver, and it definitely satisfied.

The problems with the show were more indicative of long-term issues within the company, and are unlikely to change.  Randy Orton’s feud with Rusev is the same sort of bullshit that the latter has had to deal with for the past two years.  Jinder Mahal is still champion because the company has yet to make it to India and see what he can do for business there.  And even when two top-tier talents like Natalya and Charlotte are involved, women’s title matches are still booked as undercard filler matches.  Don’t forget that Charlotte headlined this same PPV last year in the first ever women’s HIAC match (and first-ever PPV main event).  So for all of the good moments, and there were plenty on the card, there were still a number of head-slapping parts as well.  The bigger trouble, then, is the fact that these disappointments were so predictable going into the show.

The show kicked off with the Uso/New Day tag match, and it was the right call to start things off hot.  Of course, the show also peaked with this contest, so it did set the bar too high for others to follow.  Big E and Xavier Woods worked this one, and they made great challengers to the vicious Usos.  No time was wasted as all four men went for weapons at the bell and got right to work.  The fast pace was set from the start and really sold the hatred between the teams, while the immediate use of the no-DQ rules and cell itself proved the stipulation was the right decision.  There was less of the expected high flying from either team, which meant that those moments really counted when they came.  Instead, there was some of the most extensive and brutal-looking weapon work I’ve seen in a long time.  Some of the stuff they did bordered on hardcore wrestling, sans blood, with a ton of Singapore canes in use, and the Usos busting out some handcuffs.  The violent highpoint was the twins cuffing Woods over a ringpost and delivering stereo cane shots for at least thirty seconds.  Also of note the first-time use of canes to trap Jay Uso in the corner of the cell like prison bars.  Innovative stuff, and wrestling worth getting excited over, which has been rare as of late.  The Usos pulled off a surprise victory, and it worked beautifully given how ruthless they had been throughout the match.  This was the best HIAC match in a long time, and an absolute war of a show opener.  

There was no chance in hell that anyone could follow that, and even less for Randy Orton and Rusev to come close.  This has been a blip of a feud, saved only because its cumulative in-ring time up to that point had been less than twenty seconds.  I have no clue who Rusev pissed off, but he’s been getting buried for two-and-a-half years now.  It also doesn’t help that Orton is part of the old guard burial committee that includes John Cena.  That said, this was way better than I was expecting, and was the best Rusev has looked in a very long time.  There really was a sense that he could pull off a surprise win once things got going, and he held his own for the entirety of the match.  But as always, Orton hit another RKO and put his victory-starved challenger away.  That move is more protected than the Pedigree at this point, and given Orton’s advancing age and lack of purpose on the roster, it would be nice to see someone as deserving as Rusev kick out and claim at least one win.

AJ Styles was supposed to put his U.S. Title on the line against Baron Corbin, but a last-minute plea from Tye Dillinger (who’d just beaten Corbin on SmackDown) turned the match into a triple-threat.  That was smart, as AJ vs. Corbin was likely to be a so-so match, so Dillinger’s presence was guaranteed to add some technical proficiency.  The crowd was fully behind AJ, with Tye still a heavy cult favorite.  Corbin caught a lot of heat, mainly relating to losing his Money in the Bank contract.  From the start, it was clear that the three work well together, with AJ and Tye double-teaming Corbin before showing some real chemistry working one-on-one with each other.  I would love to see them work a match with one another down the line.  When he was in the ring, Corbin finally showed some of the dominance he brought with him to the main roster, looking like the bruising heel he is.  Apparently he’s back in WWE’s good graces, as he snuck in a win to walk out with the Championship.  Even though I hadn’t wanted that finish, I won’t complain, simply because the match itself was such an enjoyable spectacle on the card.

Natalya vs. Charlotte for the SD Women’s Championship should have been one of the better matches of the night.  They’re both two of the most solid technicians on the roster (regardless of division), and they have a history that extends beyond their legendary families.  That said, this one was turned into a Hart vs. Flair rivalry, with Ric’s recent health issues playing into the angle.  They were given a solid amount of time to work, but very little happened in that stretch.  Instead, this was a totally one-sided beating, with Natalya targeting Charlotte’s leg in every manner imaginable.  This was not good, because even though it was nice heel work from Natty.  Charlotte’s selling was top-notch, but her ruthless streak is terribly missed at this point.  The whole thing fell apart after a moonsault to the outside left Charlotte in even worse shape and Natty got herself disqualified by attacking her leg with a chair.  Not the conclusion this one deserved at all.

It isn’t easy writing about Jinder Mahal vs. Shinsuke Nakamura yet again, and that isn’t even because this match was so similar to all of their other encounters.  This isn’t even touching on the fact that WWE scripted Jiner (a Canadian-Indian) to cut racist promos on Shinsuke.  The real trouble is in the fact that this match-up is occurring at all, and that one of the unquestionable top wrestlers in the world is losing face to a former enhancement talent for business reasons.  Jinder has been champ a long time, and while he hasn’t had any outright bad matches, none of them have been good either.  That said, this was his best showing as champion by far, even if that means very little.  The positives were seeing how over Shinsuke still is, his taking an early lead in the match, and the Singh Brothers finally getting ejected from the floor.  Then the predictable finish came, and Shinsuke lost even more momentum.

Bobby Roode vs. Dolph Ziggler was slotted in the death spot before the main event, but that made sense.  They’re both good technicians, but Dolph is clearly on his way out while Roode is just getting started on the main roster.  Ziggler’s current position is sad when you think of just how great his feud with the Miz was this time last year.  His silent, blacked-out entrance was a nice touch, but the action in the ring fell short of doing the talking this time.  It was more competitive than expected, but still nothing special and there wasn’t a lot at stake.  It could have been very good if it had been built up, but something just didn’t connect, especially with anticipation for Shane vs. Owens around the corner.  For what it’s worth, Dolph laying Roode out after the match was a nice touch.

The star of the show was clearly going to be Shane McMahon vs. Kevin Owens in Hell in a Cell.  The build has been the best it could be used given Shane’s non-wrestler status, and it was a nice callback to the authority figure matches of the past.  Owens has always been top-tier when it comes to promo ability, and he was able to show why he’s one of the company’s best talkers in the build-up to the match.  His verbal attacks on Shane, his wife and children, as well as the McMahons themselves were vicious, the sort of ruthless heel promo work that’s missing from most of WWE’s programming these days.  And it would be impossible to go any further without discussing his confrontation with Vince McMahon himself on SmackDown Live.

Having suspended Shane after a confrontation with Owens, Vince decided to take the situation into his own hands.  The two exchanged words, and Vince backed up his son’s decisions, mentioning that he was disappointed Shane hadn’t taken care of Owens.  Vince himself set the stage for the Hell in a Cell match between the two.  After some tricky wording, Owens head butted Vince, drawing very real blood, and proceeded to superkick and frog splash his boss before storming out.  It was unreal how well this worked, and a big reason was because of the real backstage history between the two.  Owens, despite his amazing abilities in the ring, is not in shape by anyone’s definition.  There has been talk for years now that Vince is upset with how he appears, preferring to take a purely superficial view of one of his most talented stars.  So to see that kind of heated boss-employee relationship play out subtly onscreen, and come to such an explosive conclusion, was an example of near-perfect booking.

The match itself was very good, and even delivered some surprises, but not without some asterisks.  As everyone will point out, Shane is not a wrestler, and throws terrible punches, but is exceptionally good at taking massive leaps of faith from tall structures.  So this was always going to be limited in some regards, with Owens no doubt carrying much of the match’s workload.  And that was the case, although the two did have some great brawling throughout the contest.  On the SmackDown go-home show, Shane made the match falls count anywhere, which ensured his jumping off the cell yet again and possibly taking the win as a result.  Also interesting was just how behind Shane the audience really was, which just proves to me that KO is doing everything right as far as generating proper heel heat.  One unique angle coming into the match was the sheer number of possible yet logical outcomes.  A victory for Owens would make the most sense and would advance his character so much further.  But if Shane were to win, it would continue the feud, with the upcoming Survivor Series the perfect environment to settle the matter.  Fortunately, the actual outcome was predicted by no one, and worked all the better for it.

The majority of the match was brawling within the cell and power moves hit against the cage or through tables from under the ring.  They had a surprising amount of chemistry, and Shane again pulled off flying and submission moves no non-wrestler nearing fifty should be able to do.  After an expected table spot, Shane called for the cage to be opened, was turned down, and went under the ring for some very conveniently-placed bolt cutters.  The action spilled out onto the ramp, and before long, Owens had laid Shane out on one of the announce tables and climbed the cell.  What came next was pretty brilliant for KO’s character.  Several times he ran to the edge and teased jumping, and each time he stopped short, looked down and reconsidered.  It was the perfect reminder that Owens is not like Shane, a middle-aged stuntman looking to make a statement by putting his body at risk.  Owens is a family man, first and foremost, fighting only because it is the best way to support those he loves.  To take a leap and put himself at risk would have been wholly at odds with his gimmick, and was a wise move.

Naturally, this gave Shane the chance to ascend the cage, and the succeeding action was some of the most intense the company had presented in some time.  Combined, Shane and Owens are a hair under five hundred pounds, and men of less weight have taken hair-raising bumps through the top of the cell before.  That didn’t stop them from pulling out all the stops and using a variety of power moves atop the cell.  Owens powerbombed Shane and hit him with a senton, while Shane pulled off a suplex on his opponent.  The whole thing was nerve-wracking, and I’m amazed nothing went wrong to send them both to the mat.  It was brutal stuff, and befitting such an intensely personal feud.  After escaping and deciding he’d had enough, Owens made for the edge and started to climb down, another brilliant move that turned the crowd against him again.  Shane followed and knocked him off halfway down through the Spanish announce table.  He dragged Owens over to the main announce table climbed up to the top of the cell once again, ready to make his long-anticipated leap of faith.

Just as Shane took to the air, a man in a hoodie appeared on the floor and pulled Owens off the table, sending Shane through it alone and putting him totally out.  The hooded man turned out to be Sami Zayn, who pulled Kevin over to get the pinfall, making good on the falls count anywhere stipulation.  That was about the most shocking thing they could have pulled off, especially since Zayn and Owens had faced off yet again a few weeks back, with Owens destroying his former best friend/lifetime rival.  That seemed to have settled their matters once again, but apparently Zayn was awoken by the beating he took, and realized that becoming aligned with Owens was the way to go.  Sami was one of the few people I never expected to turn heel, but given the way he’s been treated on TV lately, it sort of makes sense that he would turn his back on the company and his eternally well-wishing fans.  This story arc will be interesting to watch play out.

It was a very good show, clearly stolen by the bookending cell matches, but also not bad at any point in-between.  There’s a case to be made that the whole concept of a HIAC-centric PPV is unnecessary and the stipulation should be reserved for extreme cases.  However, this year’s show really did seem to call for the cell to bring finality to each of the feuds going on, and both matches really did bring some new things to the table to justify their inclusion.  Not only that, but the bookending of the show (and limiting it to two matches only) with the cage matches allowed the midcard matches to shine a bit more than they would have scattered about with the cell matches yet to come.  Oddly enough, after a considerably shaky start to the year with PPVs, WWE seems to be making a lot of necessary improvements and has been delivering some very solid shows as the year comes to an end.

 

Kevin Owens is one of the top five performers in WWE at this moment, and as I’ve said plenty of times before, my current favorite wrestler in the company.  He’s had a lot of success, holding the NXT championship, and, since his main roster promotion, the Intercontinental, Universal, and United States championships.  It seems inevitable that he’ll win the WWE Championship at some point in his career as well.  His first PPV match on the main roster was a barnburner against John Cena, which saw Owens get a clean pinfall victory over the company’s golden boy.  Even though he lost two rematches (still great encounters), he was one of the few people who seemed not to lose momentum in being sacrificed to Cena.  The thing is, Kevin Owens did all of this despite being the near-polar opposite of a top WWE star.  That he has prospered so long, and accomplished so much is a testament not only to his abilities, but the great business changes the company has made in the last few years.

Owens (wrestling as Kevin Steen) was a stalwart of the indie wrestling scene, escaping WWE’s notice and toiling away in small arenas for far longer than his friends and colleagues such as Seth Rollins and even Sami Zayn.  This was no doubt due to his look and weight, despite the unquestionable talent he has in the ring.  Despite being able to pull off back and front flips, perfect superkicks, and move with the agility of someone fifty pounds lighter, the fact that Owens is not toned and in-shape has always stuck in the company’s craw.  No one more so than body-builder elitist Vince McMahon, who was recently rumored to want Owens to wrestle in a full suit in order to hide his gut.  Despite that, Owens got the last laugh on his boss, with their bloody confrontation being one of the highlights of weekly TV this year.  While it’s not entirely related, Owens is also owner of the best TV segment of the year, with his “Festival of Friendship” alongside Chris Jericho standing as one of RAW’s best moments in a long time.

The fact that his non-wrestling segments are just as great as his in-ring work places Owens near the top of the company as far as full-time, allround performers go.  There are few people who can work a match as well as a promo just as well, and even fewer still who can match KO’s natural wit.  And all of this from a native French speaker who learned English from watching WWE.  On top of all that, Owens is one of the few career heels who can generate actual heat, as he did against Shane at HIAC, while also winning over the crowd with his impressive workrate.  Everything about him is suited for the top of the cards, and in any other era, his look would have kept him from realizing that potential.  Keeping Owens near the top of the card for most of this year has been an incredibly savvy and beneficial move, and the returns have been fantastic for fans and the company alike.  

 

Can J.T. Win the Heisman? Baver Answers Bye Week Questions

Colin: The OSU offense looks like a kid playing Madden on the easiest level. Has J.T. reinserted himself into the Heisman race?

Brent: What a turnaround, huh? Urban, Kevin Wilson, Ryan Day and JT seem to now be in sync …..at least against the softer part of OSU’s schedule that they just buzzed through. And JT’s confidence? It’s night and day since the shell-shocked look we saw from him on the sidelines late in that Oklahoma game. At a minimum, JT has a decent shot of getting to New York for the Heisman presentation IF he can get it done against the stiffer competition that Ohio State has coming up

Colin: What is the offense doing now it wasn't earlier in the year? Is this becoming Kevin Wilson's offense?

Brent: At a high level….it’s two things. One is what we just talked about, and that’s JT’s confidence. The other is the play callers (Wilson, Urban and probably Ryan Day to some extent) doing a much better job at mixing things up. Specifically, you’ve seen some run-pass options, where JT has the option of keeping, pitching, or passing. You’ve got Day’s “mesh concept”, using receiver crossing patterns that free up a WR (usually Johnny Dixon) in the middle….we’ve seen Dixon take it to the house 3 times on this play. You’ve also got the new wrinkle in using TE Rashod Berry as a fullback and lead blocker.

But back to the confidence thing and the play calling. The Buckeyes offense is now confident enough to run tempo without the fear of 3-and-outs wearing down their defense. And JT’s gotten comfortable enough to start throwing the ball over the middle and into tighter windows. As far as play calling, the OSU coaches seem to be staying one step ahead of opponents’ defensive adjustments week after week.

Colin: The Cornhuskers have gotten absolutely embarrassed the last two meetings with the Buckeyes. Is there any hope for a proud Nebraska program moving forward and do you think they regret joining the Big 10?

Brent: They are awful. And to think, OSU punter Dru Chrisman went to the trouble of traveling to Lincoln. Mike Riley was simply a bad hire. I mean, his successful days at Oregon State were behind him, and he lands the Nebraska job in 2015? I think at the very latest, Riley is gone at the end of this season, and getting Scott Frost to return to Lincoln could get things headed in the right direction pretty quickly. I am not sure it mattered whether it was the Big Ten or the Big 12….Mike Riley is not the guy to head a program like the one Nebraska has.

Colin: Going into bye week, which OSU players have shown the most improvement since the beginning of the season?

Brent: (1) JT Barrett, for the reasons we just discussed. (2) Dante Booker….he was everyone’s whipping boy after the Buckeye LBs got burnt for several big plays by Oklahoma, but he has really come on since. Everyone knew he had the skills; now he’s translated those skills into production. (3) Binjamen Victor….like Booker, he is another guy that everyone knew had all the talent in the world, but I thought maybe lacked WR instincts. He’s proved me wrong there; Victor is really starting to get it.

Colin: Who has been a disappointment?

Brent: Kendall Sheffield. 5-star athlete, 2-star cornerback….at least so far. I am still holding out a glimmer of hope that he can play corner at the level that OSU needs.

Colin: Give us an update on your picks and what games/lines will you be watching this weekend?

Brent: 16-7 against the spread…I’ve been killing it. Not a lot jumping out at me spread wise this week, so I will just take a stab at the 2 marquee games. Penn State-Michigan in Happy Valley. I think you take Michigan and the 9 ½ points here. Michigan’s defense should keep them in this one, but their offense probably keeps them from winning it. I like Notre Dame laying 3 ½ at home, hosting a USC team that is off that emotional 1-point win against Utah. I think Notre Dame is the better team here, and the home field alone is worth 3 ½ or more points.