Pencilstorm Interview: Bob Foulk for UA Council

There are eight candidates running for four seats on Upper Arlington City Council.  Pencilstorm asked each of the candidates five specific questions centered around issues that impacted Upper Arlington residents and questions that were being raised by fellow voters.  Pencilstorm will be posting their complete and unedited answers individually throughout October and reposting all their answers together in the first week of November.

We have no answers from Bob Foulk to our questionnaire.

I reached out to Bob on two occasions asking for his participation.  After the initial email request, he first called me, and then emailed the following response:

I believe I expressed well in our phone conversation that the questions posed by Pencilstorm were either inappropriate or irrelevant to the real task that will be confronted by anybody elected to our city council.  You should have asked what I would do if I won the Ohio Lottery or whether I voted for Don or Hillary in 2016 as well.
 
If there exists a true journalistic goal of informing voters then you should be asking questions that are relevant to the hard, mostly fiscal-based decisions and priorities that will confront those elected in the next four years and beyond.  There are good questions to be asked, and the League of Women Voters, Dispatch, and This Week News have asked them.  You should follow their lead.
 
But being either inappropriate or largely irrelevant to the office sought aside from qualifications, your questions are not worthy of response.  I’ll need to take the time to stop by and ask Colin about how these came about.
 
Sincerely,
Bob Foulk

 

After series began to run, I followed up and offered him another opportunity to respond. He declined again. I did the same with the other candidate who passed on forum, Omar Ganoom. Once again, we just print exactly what the candidates sent us with no editing and no comment from Pencilstorm whatsoever. - Wal Ozello

As a reminder, here are the questions we sent to all eight city council candidates:

If the election were today, would you vote for or against the school levy and why?

What qualifies you to be on Upper Arlington City Council?

If you had a magic wand and an unlimited budget, what infrastructure project you would implement?

Looking around Central Ohio, give an example of a community you think is doing it right and one that’s doing it wrong. What could Upper Arlington could learn from both? 

At Pencilstorm, we all have a love of music. In that vein, what's your favorite album and why?

 

Pencilstorm is an independent news source and does not endorse any individual candidate. In the coming days, we'll be resposting all the responses we've received in one blog, along with rationale behind why we asked what we did.

Local UA Politics coverage provided by Wal Ozello. You can email him at Pencilstormstory@gmail.com or try to catch him at Colin's Coffee. 

Check out coverage of all the candidates we've received responses from by clicking here.

 

 

Hell in a Cell: It's What's Outside That's Worse - by Big Vin Vader

Hell in a Cell - It’s What’s Outside That’s Worse follow @bigvinvader

 

Hell in a Cell is a unique show.  The titular stipulation is easily one of the best in wrestling, but only when the build and participants are just right, and the match is a unique spectacle.  Trouble is, with Hell in a Cell existing as a PPV card, as well as an outlying stipulation, it’s oversaturated and rarely delivers as it did in the past.  Also an issue is how many matches on the show use the cell, diluting the sense of urgency and danger it once represented.  Last year there were three HIAC matches, this year there were two, and both topped 2016’s offerings, while the overall card was far stronger as well.

The key to the success of the Cell matches was the quality of the feuds involved.  The New Day and the Usos have been feuding for SmackDown’s tag titles for months, almost always stealing the show when they meet.  After so many back-and-forth contests, the finality of Hell in a Cell seemed the perfect way to settle matters.  On top of that, this was the first tag team title match ever held in the structure, meaning it would be fresh and exciting.  On the other end of the card was Kevin Owens vs. Shane McMahon, in a feud that’s been building since before SummerSlam.  This one promised to be a stunt show, but the story behind it was too good to simply write it off.  Family man Kevin Owens took on the entire McMahon clan in the build-up, insulting Shane in front of his family and questioning his motives for interfering in his last match with AJ Styles.  Then, in one of the year’s best segments, Owens took on Vince himself, bloodying the CEO and cementing his clash with Shane.  Then there was the fact that the match could end in a number of ways which could all make sense for long-term.  And it’s never a bad thing to see Kevin Owens in a main-event spot.  There was little chance that this match would not deliver, and it definitely satisfied.

The problems with the show were more indicative of long-term issues within the company, and are unlikely to change.  Randy Orton’s feud with Rusev is the same sort of bullshit that the latter has had to deal with for the past two years.  Jinder Mahal is still champion because the company has yet to make it to India and see what he can do for business there.  And even when two top-tier talents like Natalya and Charlotte are involved, women’s title matches are still booked as undercard filler matches.  Don’t forget that Charlotte headlined this same PPV last year in the first ever women’s HIAC match (and first-ever PPV main event).  So for all of the good moments, and there were plenty on the card, there were still a number of head-slapping parts as well.  The bigger trouble, then, is the fact that these disappointments were so predictable going into the show.

The show kicked off with the Uso/New Day tag match, and it was the right call to start things off hot.  Of course, the show also peaked with this contest, so it did set the bar too high for others to follow.  Big E and Xavier Woods worked this one, and they made great challengers to the vicious Usos.  No time was wasted as all four men went for weapons at the bell and got right to work.  The fast pace was set from the start and really sold the hatred between the teams, while the immediate use of the no-DQ rules and cell itself proved the stipulation was the right decision.  There was less of the expected high flying from either team, which meant that those moments really counted when they came.  Instead, there was some of the most extensive and brutal-looking weapon work I’ve seen in a long time.  Some of the stuff they did bordered on hardcore wrestling, sans blood, with a ton of Singapore canes in use, and the Usos busting out some handcuffs.  The violent highpoint was the twins cuffing Woods over a ringpost and delivering stereo cane shots for at least thirty seconds.  Also of note the first-time use of canes to trap Jay Uso in the corner of the cell like prison bars.  Innovative stuff, and wrestling worth getting excited over, which has been rare as of late.  The Usos pulled off a surprise victory, and it worked beautifully given how ruthless they had been throughout the match.  This was the best HIAC match in a long time, and an absolute war of a show opener.  

There was no chance in hell that anyone could follow that, and even less for Randy Orton and Rusev to come close.  This has been a blip of a feud, saved only because its cumulative in-ring time up to that point had been less than twenty seconds.  I have no clue who Rusev pissed off, but he’s been getting buried for two-and-a-half years now.  It also doesn’t help that Orton is part of the old guard burial committee that includes John Cena.  That said, this was way better than I was expecting, and was the best Rusev has looked in a very long time.  There really was a sense that he could pull off a surprise win once things got going, and he held his own for the entirety of the match.  But as always, Orton hit another RKO and put his victory-starved challenger away.  That move is more protected than the Pedigree at this point, and given Orton’s advancing age and lack of purpose on the roster, it would be nice to see someone as deserving as Rusev kick out and claim at least one win.

AJ Styles was supposed to put his U.S. Title on the line against Baron Corbin, but a last-minute plea from Tye Dillinger (who’d just beaten Corbin on SmackDown) turned the match into a triple-threat.  That was smart, as AJ vs. Corbin was likely to be a so-so match, so Dillinger’s presence was guaranteed to add some technical proficiency.  The crowd was fully behind AJ, with Tye still a heavy cult favorite.  Corbin caught a lot of heat, mainly relating to losing his Money in the Bank contract.  From the start, it was clear that the three work well together, with AJ and Tye double-teaming Corbin before showing some real chemistry working one-on-one with each other.  I would love to see them work a match with one another down the line.  When he was in the ring, Corbin finally showed some of the dominance he brought with him to the main roster, looking like the bruising heel he is.  Apparently he’s back in WWE’s good graces, as he snuck in a win to walk out with the Championship.  Even though I hadn’t wanted that finish, I won’t complain, simply because the match itself was such an enjoyable spectacle on the card.

Natalya vs. Charlotte for the SD Women’s Championship should have been one of the better matches of the night.  They’re both two of the most solid technicians on the roster (regardless of division), and they have a history that extends beyond their legendary families.  That said, this one was turned into a Hart vs. Flair rivalry, with Ric’s recent health issues playing into the angle.  They were given a solid amount of time to work, but very little happened in that stretch.  Instead, this was a totally one-sided beating, with Natalya targeting Charlotte’s leg in every manner imaginable.  This was not good, because even though it was nice heel work from Natty.  Charlotte’s selling was top-notch, but her ruthless streak is terribly missed at this point.  The whole thing fell apart after a moonsault to the outside left Charlotte in even worse shape and Natty got herself disqualified by attacking her leg with a chair.  Not the conclusion this one deserved at all.

It isn’t easy writing about Jinder Mahal vs. Shinsuke Nakamura yet again, and that isn’t even because this match was so similar to all of their other encounters.  This isn’t even touching on the fact that WWE scripted Jiner (a Canadian-Indian) to cut racist promos on Shinsuke.  The real trouble is in the fact that this match-up is occurring at all, and that one of the unquestionable top wrestlers in the world is losing face to a former enhancement talent for business reasons.  Jinder has been champ a long time, and while he hasn’t had any outright bad matches, none of them have been good either.  That said, this was his best showing as champion by far, even if that means very little.  The positives were seeing how over Shinsuke still is, his taking an early lead in the match, and the Singh Brothers finally getting ejected from the floor.  Then the predictable finish came, and Shinsuke lost even more momentum.

Bobby Roode vs. Dolph Ziggler was slotted in the death spot before the main event, but that made sense.  They’re both good technicians, but Dolph is clearly on his way out while Roode is just getting started on the main roster.  Ziggler’s current position is sad when you think of just how great his feud with the Miz was this time last year.  His silent, blacked-out entrance was a nice touch, but the action in the ring fell short of doing the talking this time.  It was more competitive than expected, but still nothing special and there wasn’t a lot at stake.  It could have been very good if it had been built up, but something just didn’t connect, especially with anticipation for Shane vs. Owens around the corner.  For what it’s worth, Dolph laying Roode out after the match was a nice touch.

The star of the show was clearly going to be Shane McMahon vs. Kevin Owens in Hell in a Cell.  The build has been the best it could be used given Shane’s non-wrestler status, and it was a nice callback to the authority figure matches of the past.  Owens has always been top-tier when it comes to promo ability, and he was able to show why he’s one of the company’s best talkers in the build-up to the match.  His verbal attacks on Shane, his wife and children, as well as the McMahons themselves were vicious, the sort of ruthless heel promo work that’s missing from most of WWE’s programming these days.  And it would be impossible to go any further without discussing his confrontation with Vince McMahon himself on SmackDown Live.

Having suspended Shane after a confrontation with Owens, Vince decided to take the situation into his own hands.  The two exchanged words, and Vince backed up his son’s decisions, mentioning that he was disappointed Shane hadn’t taken care of Owens.  Vince himself set the stage for the Hell in a Cell match between the two.  After some tricky wording, Owens head butted Vince, drawing very real blood, and proceeded to superkick and frog splash his boss before storming out.  It was unreal how well this worked, and a big reason was because of the real backstage history between the two.  Owens, despite his amazing abilities in the ring, is not in shape by anyone’s definition.  There has been talk for years now that Vince is upset with how he appears, preferring to take a purely superficial view of one of his most talented stars.  So to see that kind of heated boss-employee relationship play out subtly onscreen, and come to such an explosive conclusion, was an example of near-perfect booking.

The match itself was very good, and even delivered some surprises, but not without some asterisks.  As everyone will point out, Shane is not a wrestler, and throws terrible punches, but is exceptionally good at taking massive leaps of faith from tall structures.  So this was always going to be limited in some regards, with Owens no doubt carrying much of the match’s workload.  And that was the case, although the two did have some great brawling throughout the contest.  On the SmackDown go-home show, Shane made the match falls count anywhere, which ensured his jumping off the cell yet again and possibly taking the win as a result.  Also interesting was just how behind Shane the audience really was, which just proves to me that KO is doing everything right as far as generating proper heel heat.  One unique angle coming into the match was the sheer number of possible yet logical outcomes.  A victory for Owens would make the most sense and would advance his character so much further.  But if Shane were to win, it would continue the feud, with the upcoming Survivor Series the perfect environment to settle the matter.  Fortunately, the actual outcome was predicted by no one, and worked all the better for it.

The majority of the match was brawling within the cell and power moves hit against the cage or through tables from under the ring.  They had a surprising amount of chemistry, and Shane again pulled off flying and submission moves no non-wrestler nearing fifty should be able to do.  After an expected table spot, Shane called for the cage to be opened, was turned down, and went under the ring for some very conveniently-placed bolt cutters.  The action spilled out onto the ramp, and before long, Owens had laid Shane out on one of the announce tables and climbed the cell.  What came next was pretty brilliant for KO’s character.  Several times he ran to the edge and teased jumping, and each time he stopped short, looked down and reconsidered.  It was the perfect reminder that Owens is not like Shane, a middle-aged stuntman looking to make a statement by putting his body at risk.  Owens is a family man, first and foremost, fighting only because it is the best way to support those he loves.  To take a leap and put himself at risk would have been wholly at odds with his gimmick, and was a wise move.

Naturally, this gave Shane the chance to ascend the cage, and the succeeding action was some of the most intense the company had presented in some time.  Combined, Shane and Owens are a hair under five hundred pounds, and men of less weight have taken hair-raising bumps through the top of the cell before.  That didn’t stop them from pulling out all the stops and using a variety of power moves atop the cell.  Owens powerbombed Shane and hit him with a senton, while Shane pulled off a suplex on his opponent.  The whole thing was nerve-wracking, and I’m amazed nothing went wrong to send them both to the mat.  It was brutal stuff, and befitting such an intensely personal feud.  After escaping and deciding he’d had enough, Owens made for the edge and started to climb down, another brilliant move that turned the crowd against him again.  Shane followed and knocked him off halfway down through the Spanish announce table.  He dragged Owens over to the main announce table climbed up to the top of the cell once again, ready to make his long-anticipated leap of faith.

Just as Shane took to the air, a man in a hoodie appeared on the floor and pulled Owens off the table, sending Shane through it alone and putting him totally out.  The hooded man turned out to be Sami Zayn, who pulled Kevin over to get the pinfall, making good on the falls count anywhere stipulation.  That was about the most shocking thing they could have pulled off, especially since Zayn and Owens had faced off yet again a few weeks back, with Owens destroying his former best friend/lifetime rival.  That seemed to have settled their matters once again, but apparently Zayn was awoken by the beating he took, and realized that becoming aligned with Owens was the way to go.  Sami was one of the few people I never expected to turn heel, but given the way he’s been treated on TV lately, it sort of makes sense that he would turn his back on the company and his eternally well-wishing fans.  This story arc will be interesting to watch play out.

It was a very good show, clearly stolen by the bookending cell matches, but also not bad at any point in-between.  There’s a case to be made that the whole concept of a HIAC-centric PPV is unnecessary and the stipulation should be reserved for extreme cases.  However, this year’s show really did seem to call for the cell to bring finality to each of the feuds going on, and both matches really did bring some new things to the table to justify their inclusion.  Not only that, but the bookending of the show (and limiting it to two matches only) with the cage matches allowed the midcard matches to shine a bit more than they would have scattered about with the cell matches yet to come.  Oddly enough, after a considerably shaky start to the year with PPVs, WWE seems to be making a lot of necessary improvements and has been delivering some very solid shows as the year comes to an end.

 

Kevin Owens is one of the top five performers in WWE at this moment, and as I’ve said plenty of times before, my current favorite wrestler in the company.  He’s had a lot of success, holding the NXT championship, and, since his main roster promotion, the Intercontinental, Universal, and United States championships.  It seems inevitable that he’ll win the WWE Championship at some point in his career as well.  His first PPV match on the main roster was a barnburner against John Cena, which saw Owens get a clean pinfall victory over the company’s golden boy.  Even though he lost two rematches (still great encounters), he was one of the few people who seemed not to lose momentum in being sacrificed to Cena.  The thing is, Kevin Owens did all of this despite being the near-polar opposite of a top WWE star.  That he has prospered so long, and accomplished so much is a testament not only to his abilities, but the great business changes the company has made in the last few years.

Owens (wrestling as Kevin Steen) was a stalwart of the indie wrestling scene, escaping WWE’s notice and toiling away in small arenas for far longer than his friends and colleagues such as Seth Rollins and even Sami Zayn.  This was no doubt due to his look and weight, despite the unquestionable talent he has in the ring.  Despite being able to pull off back and front flips, perfect superkicks, and move with the agility of someone fifty pounds lighter, the fact that Owens is not toned and in-shape has always stuck in the company’s craw.  No one more so than body-builder elitist Vince McMahon, who was recently rumored to want Owens to wrestle in a full suit in order to hide his gut.  Despite that, Owens got the last laugh on his boss, with their bloody confrontation being one of the highlights of weekly TV this year.  While it’s not entirely related, Owens is also owner of the best TV segment of the year, with his “Festival of Friendship” alongside Chris Jericho standing as one of RAW’s best moments in a long time.

The fact that his non-wrestling segments are just as great as his in-ring work places Owens near the top of the company as far as full-time, allround performers go.  There are few people who can work a match as well as a promo just as well, and even fewer still who can match KO’s natural wit.  And all of this from a native French speaker who learned English from watching WWE.  On top of all that, Owens is one of the few career heels who can generate actual heat, as he did against Shane at HIAC, while also winning over the crowd with his impressive workrate.  Everything about him is suited for the top of the cards, and in any other era, his look would have kept him from realizing that potential.  Keeping Owens near the top of the card for most of this year has been an incredibly savvy and beneficial move, and the returns have been fantastic for fans and the company alike.  

 

Pencilstorm Interview: Omar Ganoom for UA Council

There are eight candidates running for four seats on Upper Arlington City Council.  Pencilstorm asked each of the candidates five specific questions centered around issues that impacted Upper Arlington residents and questions that were being raised by fellow voters.  Pencilstorm will be posting their complete and unedited answers individually throughout October and reposting all their answers together in the first week of November.

We have no answers from Omar Ganoom to our questionnaire.

I reached out to Omar multiple times asking for his participation.  After the initial email request, he called me and was critical of two of the questions. I never received a written response.

As a reminder, here are the questions we sent to all eight city council candidates:

If the election were today, would you vote for or against the school levy and why?

What qualifies you to be on Upper Arlington City Council?

If you had a magic wand and an unlimited budget, what infrastructure project you would implement?

Looking around Central Ohio, give an example of a community you think is doing it right and one that’s doing it wrong. What could Upper Arlington could learn from both? 

At Pencilstorm, we all have a love of music. In that vein, what's your favorite album and why?

Pencilstorm is an independent news source and does not endorse any individual candidate. In the coming days, we'll be resposting all the responses we've received in one blog, along with rationale behind why we asked what we did.

Local UA Politics coverage provided by Wal Ozello. You can email him at Pencilstormstory@gmail.com or try to catch him at Colin's Coffee. 

Check out coverage of all the candidates we've received responses from by clicking here.

 

 

Can J.T. Win the Heisman? Baver Answers Bye Week Questions

Colin: The OSU offense looks like a kid playing Madden on the easiest level. Has J.T. reinserted himself into the Heisman race?

Brent: What a turnaround, huh? Urban, Kevin Wilson, Ryan Day and JT seem to now be in sync …..at least against the softer part of OSU’s schedule that they just buzzed through. And JT’s confidence? It’s night and day since the shell-shocked look we saw from him on the sidelines late in that Oklahoma game. At a minimum, JT has a decent shot of getting to New York for the Heisman presentation IF he can get it done against the stiffer competition that Ohio State has coming up

Colin: What is the offense doing now it wasn't earlier in the year? Is this becoming Kevin Wilson's offense?

Brent: At a high level….it’s two things. One is what we just talked about, and that’s JT’s confidence. The other is the play callers (Wilson, Urban and probably Ryan Day to some extent) doing a much better job at mixing things up. Specifically, you’ve seen some run-pass options, where JT has the option of keeping, pitching, or passing. You’ve got Day’s “mesh concept”, using receiver crossing patterns that free up a WR (usually Johnny Dixon) in the middle….we’ve seen Dixon take it to the house 3 times on this play. You’ve also got the new wrinkle in using TE Rashod Berry as a fullback and lead blocker.

But back to the confidence thing and the play calling. The Buckeyes offense is now confident enough to run tempo without the fear of 3-and-outs wearing down their defense. And JT’s gotten comfortable enough to start throwing the ball over the middle and into tighter windows. As far as play calling, the OSU coaches seem to be staying one step ahead of opponents’ defensive adjustments week after week.

Colin: The Cornhuskers have gotten absolutely embarrassed the last two meetings with the Buckeyes. Is there any hope for a proud Nebraska program moving forward and do you think they regret joining the Big 10?

Brent: They are awful. And to think, OSU punter Dru Chrisman went to the trouble of traveling to Lincoln. Mike Riley was simply a bad hire. I mean, his successful days at Oregon State were behind him, and he lands the Nebraska job in 2015? I think at the very latest, Riley is gone at the end of this season, and getting Scott Frost to return to Lincoln could get things headed in the right direction pretty quickly. I am not sure it mattered whether it was the Big Ten or the Big 12….Mike Riley is not the guy to head a program like the one Nebraska has.

Colin: Going into bye week, which OSU players have shown the most improvement since the beginning of the season?

Brent: (1) JT Barrett, for the reasons we just discussed. (2) Dante Booker….he was everyone’s whipping boy after the Buckeye LBs got burnt for several big plays by Oklahoma, but he has really come on since. Everyone knew he had the skills; now he’s translated those skills into production. (3) Binjamen Victor….like Booker, he is another guy that everyone knew had all the talent in the world, but I thought maybe lacked WR instincts. He’s proved me wrong there; Victor is really starting to get it.

Colin: Who has been a disappointment?

Brent: Kendall Sheffield. 5-star athlete, 2-star cornerback….at least so far. I am still holding out a glimmer of hope that he can play corner at the level that OSU needs.

Colin: Give us an update on your picks and what games/lines will you be watching this weekend?

Brent: 16-7 against the spread…I’ve been killing it. Not a lot jumping out at me spread wise this week, so I will just take a stab at the 2 marquee games. Penn State-Michigan in Happy Valley. I think you take Michigan and the 9 ½ points here. Michigan’s defense should keep them in this one, but their offense probably keeps them from winning it. I like Notre Dame laying 3 ½ at home, hosting a USC team that is off that emotional 1-point win against Utah. I think Notre Dame is the better team here, and the home field alone is worth 3 ½ or more points.

 

 

 

 

The Columbus Crew Have a Problem and I May Have the Answer.

This was story was originally published in August 2013 just after then new Crew owner Anthony Precourt assumed control of the team. Some folks inquired about re running it in light of the Crew possibly leaving town. Here you go. - Colin

Once again attendance is lagging for the Columbus Crew. As of August 1st, 2013, Frankiln County's hardest working squad rank 14th out of 19 teams in Major League Soccer with an average crowd of 14,775 per match. The team was recently sold to new owner Anthony Precourt and I thought I would offer a simple, and in my opinion, a rather obvious solution to improving attendance for the 2014 season.

Let's use myself and nine year old son Owen as a test case for this study. In the past year we have attended multiply sporting events including OSU football, basketball, baseball, CBJ, Cincinnati Reds, the Memorial Golf Tournament, and countless Clippers games. Yet we haven't bought tickets to a single Crew game. What gives?

It's not like we don't enjoy the Crew experience because we do. We like the stadium, the sport and the team. Recently when we were attending the state fair to catch some pig racing (another sporting event) we parked next to Crew Stadium and Owen said, "Dad, we should go to some more Crew games". I agreed, "Yeah Owen, we should". But when it comes time to pull the trigger I always talk myself out of it and it is easy to pinpoint why..

The Crew doesn't offer any discount for youth tickets.

The cheapest ticket I can buy to a Crew game is $23 on the South endline. Add $10 for parking and Owen and I are already out $56 before one soft drink or dippin' dot has been purchased. If he brings just one friend we are up to 79 smacks. And what if Mom wants to come too? Well, that's just crazy talk. Might as well plan a weeklong trip to Disneyworld at those velocities.  

And here is the thing, I am not a cheap skate. Once committed to an event I am all in. Why even bother to go if you are going to complain about the $8 beers? We all know the score before we walk in the gate. Supply and demand baby. "The Man" knows what that beer is worth and he knows damn well I am going to pay it. And get Owen what he wants too. What's fair is fair. In fact, I actively avoid crowded promotions like 'Dime a Dog'/ 'Buck a Brat' and the like. If I do mistakenly wind up at a stadium on some such night, I would rather pay a full $4.00 for a dog than wait 45 minutes in a line with a bunch of hill-jacks just to save a buck or 3.90. My point being, I am not looking for a bargain, I just need some relative economic value compared to my other family options. I have a little discretionary income to play with, but not enough that I don't have to make some sensible choices. Listen to me, rambling on like Suze Freaking Orman. Anyway...

 Let's address the elephant in the room shall we? The Columbus Clippers. I can get Owen into a Clipper baseball game for just THREE DOLLARS while only paying six bucks for myself. For three bucks I have been known to pile a bunch of his friends in the car just to go down and catch a couple of innings and get some grub. 

Let's get inside the numbers with some complicated "new math".  Try to stay with me.

Crew Game: 2 Adults + 2 Kids + Parking =  $102

Clippers Game: 2 Adults + 2 Kids + Parking = $23

Is a Crew game really $79 better than a Clipper game on the kid fun scale? I won't even bother to answer.

So if attendance is always disappointing, why doesn't the Crew start to offer discounts for youth tickets? 

Occasionally, I'll pose this question when I run into somebody of consequence working in the Crew organization. After some hemming and hawing the answer they seem to suggest is that they want to be perceived as "Major League". Cheap tickets would hurt their brand. Hmm. Ok. Two big problems with this answer.

1) M.L.S. really stands for Minor League Soccer. ESPN has figured this out and started to aggressively push European football covering all sorts of games along with plenty of juicy placements on Sportscenter. Kids like Owen know all about Barcelona, Manchester U. and Messi and so forth. The game has truly gone global so it's too late for MLS to fake it like they have made it. Both the Crew and the Clippers are feeder teams to something greater. Players on both teams aspire leave Columbus in a cloud of dust or just get one last paycheck playing the sport they love. They are both minor league teams. 

2) OK, let's assume the MLS is "Major League". Why do the Cincinnati Reds and Indians offer tickets for $6 and $10 respectively? Last I checked, Major League Baseball is considered pretty "Major League" yet somehow they manage to get kids into the game at a decent price without hurting their brand.  What makes the Crew so smart? What do they know that the Reds, Indians and Clippers don't?

I wish the Crew and new owner Anthony Precourt all the success in the world. I cannot promise Owen and I will be attending any games this season, but we will be keeping an eye on the team from home and Huntington Park. Let's hope they can build the organization back to a Championship level and pack the house night after night with or without my advice. 

 

Colin Gawel plays in Watershed and owns Colin's Coffee where he runs Pencilstorm in between serving customers. Learn more about him and the other Pencilstorm contributors by clicking here. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pencilstorm Interview: Brian Close for UA Council

There are eight candidates running for four seats on Upper Arlington City Council.  Pencilstorm asked each of the candidates five specific questions centered around issues that impacted Upper Arlington residents and questions that were being raised by fellow voters.  Pencilstorm will be posting their complete and unedited answers individually throughout October and reposting all their answers together in the first week of November. Answers will be posted in order they're received. Our sixth candidate, Brian Close, is featured below.

Brian Close
www.closeforuacouncil.com

If the election were today, would you vote for or against the school levy and why?
As you know, the school levy is determined by the Upper Arlington Board of Education, not City Council.  However, I am a big supporter of the schools and I believe that we cannot have a strong community without strong schools.  I know this levy/bond is very expensive for most households (especially those on fixed incomes) and I question whether the levy and bond should have been separate issues, but I believe the schools were very transparent in their process, gathered community and professional input, and applied that input to meet their immediate needs.  I am for the levy.

What qualifies you to be on Upper Arlington City Council?
I offer the community the problem-solving skills I've acquired over the course of my legal and public career as applied to my perspective as an active resident that truly understands our community's problems.  I am a business and tax attorney at Dinsmore & Shohl helping family-owned, start-up and small businesses and their owners navigate the complex legal world.  For the last 10 years, my full-time job has been to bring two sides together over divisive issues, whether it is the negotiations of a contract, the sale of a business or helping a family with succession planning.  I am also actively involved in our community as a volunteer, serving as a youth sports coach, as a member of Rotary, serving on various committees supporting the schools, serving on the UA and Grandview Board of Tax Appeals, and as a Leadership UA alumnus.  This combination of training and community involvement make me uniquely qualified to unite this community on the issues that have divided us for the last few years.

If you had a magic wand and an unlimited budget, what infrastructure project you would implement?
One of my top priorities is to address our deteriorating roads, sidewalks, sewers and parks, but I feel our city should be able to handle a majority of these issues with careful and prudent planning and budgeting and without raising additional tax dollars.  One public project that I would support if it meant no increase in taxes or a diversion of existing tax dollars from core infrastructure projects, is a community center.  Over the last 20 years our residents have not supported a community center due in part to these reasons, but if we had a magic wand and an unlimited budget (and the land to do it) I think our community would greatly benefit from a central gathering place that could serve all ages, groups and activities within our community.  Unfortunately, without a location and without community backing, it can only exist in this fantasy-like scenario at this time.

Looking around Central Ohio, give an example of a community you think is doing it right and one that’s doing it wrong. What could Upper Arlington could learn from both? 
I think it is hard to compare Upper Arlington to any of the I-270 communities because of our distinct characteristics of a landlocked community where our schools and city are unified in a singular community, but some of our neighboring communities do provide some good examples of how a city's processes can make a difference.  I think both Dublin and the University Area have both shown us how careful planning can help alleviate some of the issues that arise from commercial development.  For example, the UAC has a master plan that addresses specific issues - height, density, size, setback, parking requirements and design guidelines - for certain key areas so both residents and developers know and understand the community's expectations and can plan accordingly.  This planning also allows the community to be involved earlier in the process and lessens the urgent and loud opposition occasioned by ad hoc zoning ushering in a more civil tone.  I don't want to name communities that are doing it wrong, but I think communities that have struggled over the last few years are those that don't support their local public schools and those that don't have a community-back plan for future growth and development.

At Pencilstorm, we all have a love of music. In that vein, what's your favorite album and why?
After reading this, I went on a camping trip with my daughter (Marley) in Hamilton, Ohio.  On the way down, she told me a story of how one of her friend's name is a combination of her two grandmothers' names.  I asked Marley if she knew where her name came from, to which she responded that it came from her maternal grandmother.  Noting that she was technically correct, I told her that her name was also influenced by another person - Bob Marley - and I started playing for her my favorite Bob Marley & The Wailers albums (Exodus and Catch a Fire).  From that music came a rush of memories to my college and law school days.  For the remainder of the two hour drive down, I started listening to all of my other favorite albums from my youth (U2 - Joshua Tree and Achtung Baby), high school (don't ask), and more recently (Zac Brown Band - The Foundation and Jekyll and Hyde).  As only music can do, each album took me back to the memories I hadn't recalled in years.  So I feel like the question isn't one of my favorite album, but one of my favorite time period of my life so far.  That I can't answer because each era is special for various reaons, so I will give it to the album that has been one of my favorites for the longest periods of time and from an artist that helped influence my daughter's name:  Bob Marley & The Wailers - Catch a Fire.

Pencilstorm would like to thank Brian Close for taking the time to answer our questions.  Learn more about Brian at his website: www.closeforuacouncil.com. Pencilstorm is an independent news source and does not endorse any individual candidate.

In the coming days, we'll be resposting all the responses we've received in one blog, along with rationale behind why we asked what we did.

Local UA Politics coverage provided by Wal Ozello. You can email him at Pencilstormstory@gmail.com or try to catch him at Colin's Coffee. 

Check out coverage of all the candidates we've received responses from by clicking here.